Back to Search Start Over

Evaluation of treatment effects in patients with endometrial cancer and POLE mutations: An individual patient data meta‐analysis.

Authors :
McAlpine, Jessica N.
Chiu, Derek S.
Nout, Remi A.
Church, David N.
Schmidt, Pascal
Lam, Stephanie
Leung, Samuel
Bellone, Stefania
Wong, Adele
Brucker, Sara Y.
Lee, Cheng Han
Clarke, Blaise A.
Huntsman, David G.
Bernardini, Marcus Q.
Ngeow, Joanne
Santin, Alessandro D.
Goodfellow, Paul
Levine, Douglas A.
Köbel, Martin
Kommoss, Stefan
Source :
Cancer (0008543X). Jul2021, Vol. 127 Issue 14, p2409-2422. 14p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancers (ECs) with somatic mutations in DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) are characterized by unfavorable pathological features, which prompt adjuvant treatment. Paradoxically, women with POLE‐mutated EC have outstanding clinical outcomes, and this raises concerns of overtreatment. The authors investigated whether favorable outcomes were independent of treatment. METHODS: A PubMed search for POLE and endometrial was restricted to articles published between March 1, 2012, and March 1, 2018, that provided individual patient data (IPD), adjuvant treatment, and survival. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA) reporting guidelines for IPD, the authors used univariate and multivariate one‐stage meta‐analyses with mixed effects Cox models (random effects for study cohorts) to infer the associations of treatment, traditional prognostic factors, and outcome, which was defined as the time from first diagnosis to any adverse event (progression/recurrence or death from EC). RESULTS: Three hundred fifty‐nine women with POLE‐mutated EC were identified; 294 (82%) had pathogenic mutations. Worse outcomes were demonstrated in patients with nonpathogenic POLE mutations (hazard ratio, 3.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.47‐7.58; log‐rank P <.01). Except for stage (P <.01), traditional prognosticators were not associated with progression/recurrence or death from disease. Adverse events were rare (11 progressions/recurrences and 3 disease‐specific deaths). Salvage rates in patients who experienced recurrence were high and sustained, with 8 of 11 alive without evidence of disease (range, 5.5‐14.2 years). Adjuvant treatment was not associated with outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes for ECs with pathogenic POLE mutations are not associated with most traditional risk parameters, and patients do not appear to benefit from adjuvant therapy. The observed low rates of recurrence/progression and the high and sustained salvage rates raise the possibility of safely de‐escalating treatment for these patients. LAY SUMMARY: Ten percent of all endometrial cancers have mutations in the DNA repair gene DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE).Women who have endometrial cancers with true POLE mutations experience almost no recurrences or deaths from their cancer even when their tumors appear to have very unfavorable characteristics.Additional therapy (radiation and chemotherapy) does not appear to improve outcomes for women with POLE‐mutated endometrial cancer, and this supports the move to less therapy and less associated toxicity.Diligent classification of endometrial cancers by molecular features provides valuable information to inform prognosis and to direct treatment/no treatment. Despite often having unfavorable pathological features, women with pathogenic DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE)–mutated endometrial cancers have excellent cancer‐specific clinical outcomes, and this highlights the importance of molecular subtyping for endometrial cancer classification. Adjuvant therapy is not associated with improved outcomes for women with pathogenic POLE‐mutated endometrial cancers, and this supports de‐escalation of therapy for these patients in clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0008543X
Volume :
127
Issue :
14
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Cancer (0008543X)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
151176566
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.33516