Back to Search Start Over

Outcome of L-DEP regimen for treatment of pediatric chronic active Epstein-Barr virus infection.

Authors :
Ma, Honghao
Zhang, Liping
Wei, Ang
Yang, Jun
Wang, Dong
Zhang, Qing
Zhao, Yunze
Chen, Sitong
Lian, Hongyun
Zhang, Li
Zhou, Chunju
Qin, Maoquan
Li, Zhigang
Wang, Tianyou
Zhang, Rui
Source :
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. 6/10/2021, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p1-9. 9p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

<bold>Purpose: </bold>We intended to investigate the clinical features of paediatric patients with chronic active Epstein-Barr virus infection (CAEBV) and to examine the effectiveness of the L-DEP regimen before haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).<bold>Methods: </bold>A retrospective analysis was performed on 35 patients with CAEBV at Beijing Children's Hospital from January 2016 to January 2020. The efficacy and adverse events of the L-DEP regimen were evaluated.<bold>Results: </bold>The median age of the 35 patients was 7.0 years old (range 2.5-17.5 years). Twenty-eight patients achieved a clinical response (80.0%, 22 in clinical CR, 6 in clinical PR) after L-DEP. In terms of virological response, 7 patients (20%) were assessed as having virological CR, and 23 patients (65.7%) had virological PR. Finally, 29 patients underwent allo-HSCT. The median survival time was 18 months (2-50 months). The 3-year overall survival rates in patients treated with chemotherapy only (n = 6) and chemotherapy followed by HSCT (n = 25) were 33.3% and 75.4%, respectively. After L-DEP 1st treatment and L-DEP 2nd treatment, the EBV-DNA loads in blood and plasma were significantly reduced compared with those before chemotherapy (median: 4.29 × 105 copies/ml vs. 1.84 × 106 copies/ml, Mann-Whitney U: P = 0.0004; 5.00 × 102 copies/ml vs. 3.17 × 103 copies/ml, Mann-Whitney U; P = 0.003; 2.27 × 105 copies/ml vs. 1.84 × 106 copies/ml, P = 0.0001; 5.00 × 102 copies/ml vs. 3.17 × 103 copies/ml, P = 0.003). Compared with the liver and spleen size before chemotherapy, the size of the liver and spleen shrank significantly after L-DEP 2nd (median 3.8 cm vs. 1.9 cm, P = 0.003; 3.8 cm vs. 0 cm, P < 0.008). In addition, after L-DEP treatment, there was no difference in the clinical or virological response rate regardless of HLH status (clinical response: 77.3% vs. 84.6%, P = 0.689; virological response: 90.9% vs. 76.9%, P = 0.337).<bold>Conclusion: </bold>The L-DEP regimen is an effective therapy in CAEBV for bridging to allo-HSCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17501172
Volume :
16
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
150821881
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-01909-y