Back to Search
Start Over
Clinical Outcome of Reoperation for Mechanical Prosthesis at Aortic Position.
- Source :
-
Heart, Lung & Circulation . Jul2021, Vol. 30 Issue 7, p1084-1090. 7p. - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- <bold>Aim: </bold>Redo aortic valve surgery is usually associated with a high risk of mortality and complications. The aim of this study was to investigate the perioperative and long-term outcomes of reoperation after prior mechanical prosthesis implantation at the aortic position.<bold>Method: </bold>The clinical data of 146 consecutive patients who underwent reoperation at the aortic position between 2003 and 2019 were analysed.<bold>Results: </bold>Mean age was 51.5±12.7 years and 69 (47.3%) were female. The median interval from prior surgery to redo aortic valve surgery was 6 years. The aetiologies were pannus formation with prosthetic aortic stenosis in 62 cases (42.5%), prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) in five (3.4%), PVE with perivalvular leakage (PVL) in 16 (11.0%), PVL in 45 (30.8%), thrombosis in seven (4.8%), and aortic disease in 11 (7.5%). As for surgical procedure, aortic valve replacement was performed in 81 cases (55.5%), Bentall in 34 (23.3%), PVL repair in six (4.1%), and pannus debridement in 25 (17.1%). Fourteen (14) (9.6%) patients expired perioperatively. Prolonged ventilation time and postoperative renal failure were proved to be significant independent predictors of mortality according to multivariate analysis. Overall survival was 87.8%±7.4% and 76.4%±15.1% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Survival was 87.7%±13.7% and 84.2%±15.6% in the pannus group, and 84.5%±12.6% and 74.6%±19.4% in the non-pannus group at 5 and 10 years, respectively (p=0.951). Survival was 87.5%±14.2% and 75.8%±22.7% in the PVL group and 84.7%±11.9% and 81.6%±13.5% in the non-PVL group at 5 and 10 years, respectively (p=0.365).<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Pannus formation and PVL are two major indications for reoperation of mechanical prosthesis at the aortic position. Redo aortic valve surgery has a satisfactory outcome but with a high risk of complications. Long-term survival of patients seems not to be related to the aetiology. Final decision-making of redo aortic valve surgery should be based on aetiology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 14439506
- Volume :
- 30
- Issue :
- 7
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Heart, Lung & Circulation
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 150616307
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2021.01.002