Back to Search Start Over

Installation of fuel cell-based cogeneration systems in the commercial and retail sector: Assessment in the framework of the COMSOS project.

Authors :
Accurso, F.
Gandiglio, M.
Santarelli, M.
Buunk, J
Hakala, T.
Kiviaho, J.
Modena, S.
Münch, M.
Varkaraki, E.
Source :
Energy Conversion & Management. Jul2021, Vol. 239, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

• At current costs, SOFC is economically convenient only with subsidies. • Germany, Italy and UK seem are the most suitable markets for this technology. • At target costs SOFC becomes the most attractive solutions to produce energy. • At target cost, RPBT is 5 years in Italy and Germany and 4 years in UK. • With 1 stack replacement in 15 years, there is a reduction in RPBT up to 7 years. This work studies the technical and economic feasibility of the introduction of a SOFC-based cogeneration system to supply non-residential buildings with electricity and heat. The techno-economic evaluation is performed for the hotel and hospital sectors, by introducing real hourly load profiles (electrical and thermal) for the buildings. The analysis considers different countries in terms of energy intensity (and load profiles), cost of energy and regulations/incentives. Results are achieved by comparing the SOFC scenario with a benchmark one where electricity is supplied by the grid and heat by a natural gas fed boiler and evaluating the relative payback time between the two solutions. The analysis showed that, despite the current high investment cost of the SOFC system, in countries such as Germany, Italy and UK (where electricity prices are among the highest in Europe), the option is yet advisable if supported by effective subsidies (already existing for cogeneration systems), and it could offer a competitive alternative to traditional systems, especially in the hospital sector, where the relative payback time is achieved in the 10th year for UK, and in the 14th year for Germany and Italy. A cost reduction scenario has also been analyzed: results show that the SOFC is the best option in most of the locations, both economically and in terms of environmental impact (pollutants emissions reduction). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01968904
Volume :
239
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Energy Conversion & Management
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
150387380
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114202