Back to Search Start Over

The comparison study of multiple biochar stability assessment methods.

Authors :
Chen, Jiefeng
Wang, Pengyu
Ding, Lisha
Yu, Ting
Leng, Songqi
Chen, Jie
Fan, Liangliang
Li, Jingjing
Wei, Liang
Li, Jun
Lu, Qian
Leng, Lijian
Zhou, Wenguang
Source :
Journal of Analytical & Applied Pyrolysis. Jun2021, Vol. 156, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

[Display omitted] • VM/FC and VM/(FC + VM) could be used as a substitute indicator for O/C or H/C. • The standardization of the indicators of biochar stability was linked with O/C. • Pyrolysis temperature was the main factor affecting biochar stability. • Abiotic biochar stability assessment methods were divided into three categories. Biochar produced from thermochemical processing biomass is being developed as an effective way to mitigate climate change. The stability of biochar means the potential capability of fixing biochar carbon in the soil environment. The method for biochar stability assessment is significant to its climate change mitigation potential. However, there is no standard method available to use, and the stability of biochar assessed by the diverse methods has a significant difference. Nevertheless, the comparative study on the diversified stability assessment methods is limited. In the present study, the biochars were pyrolyzed from soybean straw, wood sawdust, and Chlorella Vulgaris at temperatures ranging from 300 to 800 °C. Then, the evaluation methods, such as ultimate analysis, proximate analysis, the Edinburgh stability tool, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), solid state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and thermogravimetric analysis, were compared to assess the stability of biochars. The stability indicators obtained by most methods, excluding aromatic C from NMR and C–C/C = C/ C–H from XPS, were closely related to the pyrolysis temperature (ANOVA analysis, p < 0.05). The volatile matter/(fixed carbon + volatile matter) had high correlations with other indicators (Pearson coefficient, |r|>0.36, p < 0.05) except for C–C/C = C/C–H from XPS. The cluster analysis indicates the studied stability methods could be divided into three categories, according to which the proximate analysis may be developed as an alternative to O/C and H/C. These research findings help provide the reference for the classification and selection of stability assessment method for the accurate and efficient evaluation of biochar stability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01652370
Volume :
156
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Analytical & Applied Pyrolysis
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
150359527
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105070