On the importance of interaural noise coherence and the medial olivocochlear reflex for binaural unmasking in free-field listening.

• We investigate binaural unmasking in free-field conditions for normal-hearing listeners. • The noise but not the speech in the worse acoustic ear is necessary for unmasking to occur. • Binaural unmasking requires the noise stimuli at the eardrums to be binaurally coherent. • The medial olivocochlear efferent reflex does not contribute to binaural unmasking. For speech in competition with a noise source in the free field, normal-hearing (NH) listeners recognize speech better when listening binaurally than when listening monaurally with the ear that has the better acoustic signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). This benefit from listening binaurally is known as binaural unmasking and indicates that the brain combines information from the two ears to improve intelligibility. Here, we address three questions pertaining to binaural unmasking for NH listeners. First, we investigate if binaural unmasking results from combining the speech and/or the noise from the two ears. In a simulated acoustic free field with speech and noise sources at 0° and 270°azimuth, respectively, we found comparable unmasking regardless of whether the speech was present or absent in the ear with the worse SNR. This indicates that binaural unmasking probably involves combining only the noise at the two ears. Second, we investigate if having binaurally coherent location cues for the noise signal is sufficient for binaural unmasking to occur. We found no unmasking when location cues were coherent but noise signals were generated incoherent or were processed unilaterally through a hearing aid with linear, minimal amplification. This indicates that binaural unmasking requires interaurally coherent noise signals, source location cues, and processing. Third, we investigate if the hypothesized antimasking benefits of the medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) contribute to binaural unmasking. We found comparable unmasking regardless of whether speech tokens (words) were sufficiently delayed from the noise onset to fully activate the MOCR or not. Moreover, unmasking was absent when the noise was binaurally incoherent whereas the physiological antimasking effects of the MOCR are similar for coherent and incoherent noises. This indicates that the MOCR is unlikely involved in binaural unmasking. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]