Back to Search Start Over

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, p-tolualdehyde, CAS Registry Number 104-87-0.

Authors :
Api, A.M.
Belsito, D.
Biserta, S.
Botelho, D.
Bruze, M.
Burton, G.A.
Buschmann, J.
Cancellieri, M.A.
Dagli, M.L.
Date, M.
Dekant, W.
Deodhar, C.
Fryer, A.D.
Gadhia, S.
Jones, L.
Joshi, K.
Lapczynski, A.
Lavelle, M.
Liebler, D.C.
Na, M.
Source :
Food & Chemical Toxicology. 2021 Supplement 1, Vol. 149, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

The existing information supports the use of this material as described in this safety assessment. p -Tolualdehyde was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, developmental and reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity, skin sensitization potential, and environmental safety. Data from read-across analog benzaldehyde (CAS # 100-52-7) show that p- tolualdehyde is not expected to be genotoxic. Data from read-across analog cuminaldehyde (CAS # 122-03-2) provided p- tolualdehyde a No Expected Sensitization Induction Level (NESIL) of 1100 μg/cm2 for the skin sensitization endpoint. The repeated dose toxicity, developmental and reproductive toxicity, and local respiratory toxicity endpoints were completed using the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) for a Cramer Class I material, and the exposure to p- tolualdehyde is below the TTC (0.03 mg/kg/day, 0.03 mg/kg/day, and 1.4 mg/day, respectively). The phototoxicity/photoallergenicity endpoints were evaluated based on data from read-across analog 4-ethylbenzaldehyde (CAS # 4748-78-1); p- tolualdehyde is not expected to be phototoxic/photoallergenic. The environmental endpoints were evaluated; p -tolualdehyde was found not to be persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT) as per the International Fragrance Association (IFRA) Environmental Standards, and its risk quotients, based on its current volume of use in Europe and North America (i.e., Predicted Environmental Concentration/Predicted No Effect Concentration [PEC/PNEC]), are <1. • p -Tolualdehyde; a safety assessment based on RIFM's criteria. • A safety assessment based on 7 human health endpoints plus environmental. • All endpoints were cleared using target data, read-across, and/or TTC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02786915
Volume :
149
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Food & Chemical Toxicology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
149760905
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2021.111982