Back to Search Start Over

Unveiling the dynamic of water-electricity conflict within and beyond megacity boundary.

Authors :
Zhao, Xu
Liao, Xiawei
Zhang, Chao
Zhang, Xinxin
Mao, Ganquan
Zhang, Shuo
Tillotson, Martin R.
Source :
Journal of Environmental Management. May2021, Vol. 286, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Electricity demand in megacities may exert substantial stress on water resources, which is often expressed through the water scarcity footprint for electricity consumption (WSFE). Conversely, water scarcity may constrain electricity production, leading to increased vulnerability for megacities electricity production. The WSFE and the water related vulnerability of electricity production reflect two aspects of water-electricity conflict. This varies over time by both the amount and location of electricity production. However, no studies have conducted time-series analysis to evaluate the trends of these two indicators, both in terms of severity and spatial characteristics. Our study focused on evaluating trends in water-electricity conflict both within and beyond megacity administrative boundaries. China's four provincial-level megacities, i.e. Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai and Chongqing, were chosen as case studies. The results show that water related vulnerability of electricity production in Tianjin, Beijing, Shanghai and Chongqing was diverse and can be classified as extreme, severe, moderate and minor, respectively. Between 2006 and 2016, the WSFE of Tianjin experienced an increasing trend, and its water related vulnerability of electricity production remained at the highest level. Beijing's WSFE has decreased, but its water related vulnerability of electricity production has increased. These differing trends highlight the need for joint reductions to both WSFE and water related vulnerability of electricity production in mitigating water-electricity conflict. [Display omitted] • Water related vulnerability of electricity production was dynamic during 2006–2016. • Water related vulnerability in four Chinese megacities was diverse. • Tianjin had the highest water related vulnerability and water scarcity footprint. • The external water scarcity footprint of Beijing was the largest, but decreasing. • Changes in water related vulnerability may differ to water scarcity footprint. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03014797
Volume :
286
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Environmental Management
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
149450835
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112259