Back to Search Start Over

Association between In-hospital Mortality and Low Cardiac Output Syndrome with Morning versus Afternoon Cardiac Surgery.

Authors :
Hijazi, Ryan M.
Sessler, Daniell.
Liang, Chen
Rodriguez- Patarroyo, Fabio A .
Soltesz, Edward G.
Duncan, Andra E.
Sessler, Daniel I
Source :
Anesthesiology. Apr2021, Vol. 134 Issue 4, p552-561. 10p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>Recent work suggests that having aortic valve surgery in the morning increases risk for cardiac-related complications. This study therefore explored whether mortality and cardiac complications, specifically low cardiac output syndrome, differ for morning and afternoon cardiac surgeries.<bold>Methods: </bold>The study included adults who had aortic and/or mitral valve repair/replacement and/or coronary artery bypass grafting from 2011 to 2018. The components of the in-hospital composite outcome were in-hospital mortality and low cardiac output syndrome, defined by requirement for at least two inotropic agents at 24 to 48 h postoperatively or need for mechanical circulatory support. Patients who had aortic cross-clamping between 8 and 11 am (morning surgery) versus between 2 and 5 pm (afternoon surgery) were compared on the incidence of the composite outcome.<bold>Results: </bold>Among 9,734 qualifying operations, 0.4% (29 of 6,859) died after morning, and 0.7% (20 of 2,875) died after afternoon surgery. The composite of in-hospital mortality and low cardiac output syndrome occurred in 2.8% (195 of 6,859) of morning patients and 3.4% (97 of 2,875) of afternoon patients: morning versus afternoon confounder-adjusted odds ratio, 0.96 (95% CI, 0.75 to 1.24; P = 0.770). There was no evidence of interaction between morning versus afternoon and surgery type (P = 0.965), and operation time was statistically nonsignificant for surgery subgroups.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Patients having aortic valve surgery, mitral valve surgery, and/or coronary artery bypass grafting with aortic cross-clamping in the morning and afternoon did not have significantly different outcomes. No evidence was found to suggest that morning or afternoon surgical timing alters postoperative risk.<bold>Editor’s Perspective: </bold> [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00033022
Volume :
134
Issue :
4
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Anesthesiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
149352334
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000003728