ENVIRONMENTAL LAW — AGENCY DISCRETION AVERSION — SIXTH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT AGENCIES ARE NOT BOUND BY THE ESA OR NEPA WHEN REVIEWING OIL SPILL RESPONSE PLANS. — National Wildlife Federation v. Secretary of the U.S. Department of Transportation, 960 F.3d 872 (6th Cir. 2020).

MLA

“ENVIRONMENTAL LAW — AGENCY DISCRETION AVERSION — SIXTH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT AGENCIES ARE NOT BOUND BY THE ESA OR NEPA WHEN REVIEWING OIL SPILL RESPONSE PLANS. — National Wildlife Federation v. Secretary of the U.S. Department of Transportation, 960 F.3d 872 (6th Cir. 2020).” Harvard Law Review, vol. 134, no. 5, Mar. 2021, pp. 1905–12. EBSCOhost, widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=asx&AN=149318057&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.

APA

ENVIRONMENTAL LAW — AGENCY DISCRETION AVERSION — SIXTH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT AGENCIES ARE NOT BOUND BY THE ESA OR NEPA WHEN REVIEWING OIL SPILL RESPONSE PLANS. — National Wildlife Federation v. Secretary of the U.S. Department of Transportation, 960 F.3d 872 (6th Cir. 2020). (2021). Harvard Law Review, 134(5), 1905–1912.

Chicago

“ENVIRONMENTAL LAW — AGENCY DISCRETION AVERSION — SIXTH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT AGENCIES ARE NOT BOUND BY THE ESA OR NEPA WHEN REVIEWING OIL SPILL RESPONSE PLANS. — National Wildlife Federation v. Secretary of the U.S. Department of Transportation, 960 F.3d 872 (6th Cir. 2020).” 2021. Harvard Law Review 134 (5): 1905–12. http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=asx&AN=149318057&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.