Back to Search Start Over

Adrenal metastases: early biphasic contrast-enhanced CT findings with emphasis on differentiation from lipid-poor adrenal adenomas.

Authors :
Zhu, F.
Zhu, X.
Shi, H.
Liu, C.
Xu, Z.
Shao, M.
Tian, F.
Wang, J.
Source :
Clinical Radiology. Apr2021, Vol. 76 Issue 4, p294-301. 8p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

<bold>Aim: </bold>To evaluate the accuracy of unenhanced attenuation and early biphasic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in differentiating adrenal metastases (AMs) from lipid-poor adrenal adenomas (AAs).<bold>Materials and Methods: </bold>This retrospective study included 37 patients with 50 AMs and 86 patients with 89 lipid-poor AAs. Quantitative data including the longest diameter (LD), the shortest diameter (SD), LD/SD ratio, CT attenuation values (CTu, CTa, CTv), degree of enhancement (DEAP, DEPP, DEpeak, APW, RPW), and peak enhanced/unenhanced (PE/U) CT attenuation ratio were obtained. Qualitative data including enhancement pattern, location, shape, the presence of calcification or haemorrhage, and intra-lesion necrosis were analysed. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were also calculated.<bold>Results: </bold>The PE/U ratio (≤1.25), CTu (≥32.2 HU), DEpeak (≤43.15 HU), DEPP (≤37.65 HU), presence of intralesional necrosis, location (bilateral adrenal glands), and irregular shape were significant variables for differentiating AMs from lipid-poor AAs (p<0.05). Among them, PE/U ratio (≤1.25) was of greater value in differentiating the two adrenal diseases, with sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating curve (ROC) curve (AUC) of 92%, 84%, 0.933, respectively. When at least any three of above criteria were combined, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for diagnosing AMs were 88%, 93%, 88%, and 88%, respectively.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>These seven CT criteria are conducive to differentiate AMs from lipid-poor AAs. Early biphasic contrast-enhanced CT is a high-efficient and practical imaging tool in differentiating them. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00099260
Volume :
76
Issue :
4
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Clinical Radiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
149074310
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2020.12.012