Back to Search Start Over

Quality of Life: A Prospective Randomized Trial of Palliative Volumetric Arc Therapy Versus 3-Dimensional Conventional Radiation Therapy.

Authors :
Wong, Philip
Lambert, Louise
Thanomsack, Phengsavanh
Coulombe, Genevieve
Lambert, Carole
Charpentier, Anne-Marie
Barkati, Maroie
Fortin, Israel
Lafontaine, Julie
Roberge, David
Source :
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. Apr2021, Vol. 109 Issue 5, p1431-1439. 9p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

<bold>Purpose: </bold>Volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) is a radiation therapy (RT) technique that spares normal tissues from high and intermediate RT doses but increases the volume of tissues receiving low doses of RT compared with 3-dimensional conformal RT (3DCRT). We hypothesized that palliative VMAT would reduce the detriment to patient quality of life (QOL) compared with palliative 3DCRT.<bold>Methods and Materials: </bold>This phase 2 trial randomized patients to palliative RT using VMAT or 3DCRT to 1 painful site of metastatic disease in the trunk. Treating physicians could choose 8 Gy in 1 fraction or 20 Gy in 5 fractions to stratify randomization. The primary endpoint was the change in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Version 3.0 (EORTC QLQ-C30) global health status QOL subscale at 1 week after RT. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to assess the relationship of patient QOL over time with other factors.<bold>Results: </bold>From July 2014 to November 2017, 37 patients who underwent 3DCRT and 32 patients who underwent VMAT were randomized into the study. Median overall survival was 9 months. Overall pain responses to RT were equivalent (P = .53) between the techniques. Patient compliance in returning QOL questionnaires was 94%, 81%, and 69% at baseline, 1 week after RT, and 1 month after RT, respectively. At 1 week after RT, change in global QOL was not significantly (P = .31) different between VMAT versus 3DCRT. At 4 weeks after RT, VMAT induced significantly (P = .049) less global QOL deterioration than 3DCRT did. Patients who underwent VMAT maintained better physical (P = .012), role (P = .041), and social (P = .025) functioning, but they reported more diarrhea symptoms (P = .017) than in the 3DCRT group.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Palliative VMAT and 3DCRT did not differ in their ability to control pain; however, palliative VMAT induced fewer QOL detriments than 3DCRT did at 4 weeks after RT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03603016
Volume :
109
Issue :
5
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
149053261
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.11.061