Back to Search Start Over

The incidence rate of pulmonary arterial hypertension and scleroderma renal crisis in systemic sclerosis patients with digital ulcers on endothelin antagonist receptors (ERAs) and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5i).

Authors :
Pestaña-Fernández, Melani
Rubio-Rivas, Manuel
Tolosa-Vilella, Carles
Guillén-Del-Castillo, Alfredo
Colunga-Argüelles, Dolores
Argibay, Ana
Marí-Alfonso, Begoña
Marín-Ballvé, Adela
Pla-Salas, Xavier
Chamorro, Antonio-J
Castro-Salomó, Antoni
Madroñero-Vuelta, Ana Belén
Sánchez-García, María Esther
Sáez-Comet, Luis
González-Echávarri, Cristina
Ortego-Centeno, Norberto
Vargas-Hitos, José Antonio
Todolí-Parra, José Antonio
Trapiella-Martínez, Luis
Lledó, Gema María
Source :
Rheumatology. Feb2021, Vol. 60 Issue 2, p872-880. 9p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Introduction Endothelin antagonist receptors (ERAs) and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5i) are beneficial in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and digital ulcers (DU) and prevent from DU recurrences. Our study aimed to determine the difference in the incidence rate of PAH and scleroderma renal crisis (SRC) in patients with SSc and DU (SSc-DU) under ERAs/PDE5i or without treatment. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study including SSc-DU patients from the Spanish Scleroderma Registry (RESCLE). The primary outcome was the incidence rate of PAH and SRC in patients under ERAs/PDE5i or not. Results Some 544 patients out of 1817 (29.9%) in the RESCLE database had DU, 221 (40.6%) under ERAs/PDE5i and 323 (59.4%) not. The incidence rate (95% CI) difference between patients under treatment or not under did not reach statistical significance in PAH [−0.1 (−4.8, 4.69), P  = 0.988] or in SRC [0.7 (−2.2, 3.7), P  = 0.620]. However, the time from the first DU to the diagnosis of SRC was delayed in treated patients [mean (s. d.) 7.6 (5.8) years vs 2.9  (5.3); P  = 0.021]. The dcSSc subset was more prevalent in the treatment group (36 vs 26%; P  = 0.018), along with anti-topoisomerase I antibodies (34 vs 18%; P  < 0.001) and tendon friction rubs (12 vs 6%; P  = 0.038), whereas the lcSSc subset was more prevalent in the no-treatment group (57 vs 66%; P  = 0.031) along with ACA (37 vs 46%; P  = 0.031). Conclusion There was no difference in the incidence rate of PAH and SRC between groups. However, treatment with ERAs and/or PDE5i appeared to delay the occurrence of SRC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14620324
Volume :
60
Issue :
2
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Rheumatology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
148548154
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keaa401