Back to Search Start Over

Assessing variability of optimum air temperature for photosynthesis across site-years, sites and biomes and their effects on photosynthesis estimation.

Authors :
Chang, Qing
Xiao, Xiangming
Doughty, Russell
Wu, Xiaocui
Jiao, Wenzhe
Qin, Yuanwei
Source :
Agricultural & Forest Meteorology. Mar2021, Vol. 298, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

• Optimum air temperature of photosynthesis from GPP EC agree well with those from MODIS EVI. • Optimum air temperature of photosynthesis from GPP EC and MODIS EVI differed substantially from those that are currently used in satellite-based models. • Use of optimum air temperature of photosynthesis from site-year specific or biome-specific approaches can affects global GPP estimates substantially. Gross primary productivity (GPP) of vegetation is affected by air temperature. Biogeochemical models use the optimum air temperature (T opt) parameter, which comes from biome-specific look-up tables (T opt − b − LT). Many studies have shown that plants have the capacity to adapt to changes in environmental conditions over time, which suggests that the static T opt − b − LT parameters in the biogeochemical models may poorly represent actual T opt and induce uncertainty in GPP estimates. Here, we estimated biome-specific, site-year-specific, and site-specific optimum air temperature using GPP data from eddy covariance (EC) flux tower sites (GPP EC) (T opt − b − EC , T opt − sy − EC , T opt − s − EC), the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) from MODIS images (T opt − b − EVI , T opt − sy − EVI , T opt − s − EVI), and mean daytime air temperature (T DT). We evaluated the consistency among the four T opt parameters (T opt − b , T opt − sy , T opt − s and T opt − b − LT), and assessed how they affect satellite-based GPP estimates. We find that T opt parameters from MODIS EVI agree well with those from GPP EC , which indicates that EVI can be used as a variable to estimate T opt at individual pixels over large spatial domains. T opt − b , T opt − sy , and T opt − s differed significantly from T opt − b − LT. GPP estimates using T opt − b and T opt − sy were more consistent with GPP EC than when using T opt − b − LT for all the land cover types. Our use of T opt − sy substantially improved 8-day and annual GPP estimates across biomess (from 1% to 34%), especially for cropland, grassland, and open shrubland. Our simple calculation shows that global GPP estimates differ by up to 10 Pg C/yr when using our suggested T opt − sy − EVI instead of using the static T opt − b − LT. Our new approach on estimating T opt has the potential to improve estimates of GPP from satellite-based models, which could lead to better understanding of carbon-climate interactions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01681923
Volume :
298
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Agricultural & Forest Meteorology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
148314998
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108277