The image quality of deep-learning image reconstruction of chest CT images on a mediastinal window setting.

<bold>Aim: </bold>To assess the image quality of deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) of chest computed tomography (CT) images on a mediastinal window setting in comparison to an adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR-V).<bold>Materials and Methods: </bold>Thirty-six patients were evaluated retrospectively. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced chest CT and thin-section images were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP); ASiR-V (60% and 100% blending setting); and DLIR (low, medium, and high settings). Image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were evaluated objectively. Two independent radiologists evaluated ASiR-V 60% and DLIR subjectively, in comparison with FBP, on a five-point scale in terms of noise, streak artefact, lymph nodes, small vessels, and overall image quality on a mediastinal window setting (width 400 HU, level 60 HU). In addition, image texture of ASiR-Vs (60% and 100%) and DLIR-high was analysed subjectively.<bold>Results: </bold>Compared with ASiR-V 60%, DLIR-med and DLIR-high showed significantly less noise, higher SNR, and higher CNR (p<0.0001). DLIR-high and ASiR-V 100% were not significantly different regarding noise (p=0.2918) and CNR (p=0.0642). At a higher DLIR setting, noise was lower and SNR and CNR were higher (p<0.0001). DLIR-high showed the best subjective scores for noise, streak artefact, and overall image quality (p<0.0001). Compared with ASiR-V 60%, DLIR-med and DLIR-high scored worse in the assessment of small vessels (p<0.0001). The image texture of DLIR-high was significantly finer than that of ASIR-Vs (p<0.0001).<bold>Conclusions: </bold>DLIR-high improved the objective parameters and subjective image quality by reducing noise and streak artefacts and providing finer image texture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]