Back to Search Start Over

Transition From Temporary to Durable Circulatory Support Systems.

Authors :
Saeed, Diyar
Potapov, Evgenij
Loforte, Antonio
Morshuis, Michiel
Schibilsky, David
Zimpfer, Daniel
Riebandt, Julia
Pappalardo, Federico
Attisani, Matteo
Rinaldi, Mauro
Haneya, Assad
Ramjankhan, Faiz
Donker, Dirk W
Jorde, Ulrich P
Stein, Julia
Tsyganenko, Dmytro
Jawad, Khalil
Wieloch, Radi
Ayala, Rafael
Cremer, Jochen
Source :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). Dec2020, Vol. 76 Issue 25, p2956-2964. 9p.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>The decision to implant durable mechanical circulatory systems (MCSs) in patients on extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is challenging due to expected poor outcomes in these patients.<bold>Objectives: </bold>The aim of this study was to identify outcome predictors that may facilitate future patient selection and decision making.<bold>Methods: </bold>The Durable MCS after ECLS registry is a multicenter retrospective study that gathered data on consecutive patients who underwent MCS implantation after ECLS between January 2010 and August 2018 in 11 high-volume European centers. Several perioperative parameters were collected. The primary endpoint was survival at 1 year after durable MCS implantation.<bold>Results: </bold>A total of 531 durable MCSs after ECLS were implanted during this period. The average patient age was 53 ± 12 years old. ECLS cannulation was peripheral in 87% of patients and 33% of the patients had history of cardiopulmonary resuscitation before ECLS implantation. The 30-day, 1-year, and 3-year actuarial survival rates were 77%, 53%, and 43%, respectively. The following predictors for 1-year outcome have been observed: age, female sex, lactate value, Model of End-Stage Liver Disease XI score, history of atrial fibrillation, redo surgery, and body mass index >30 kg/m2. On the basis of this data, a risk score and an app to estimate 1-year mortality was created.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>The outcome in patients receiving durable MCS after ECLS remains limited, yet preoperative factors may allow differentiating futile patients from those with significant survival benefit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
07351097
Volume :
76
Issue :
25
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
147662958
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.10.036