Back to Search Start Over

Coverage of the external prostatic region by the hybrid method compared with the conventional method of prostate low-dose-rate brachytherapy: A randomized controlled study.

Authors :
Nobumichi Tanaka
Isao Asakawa
Yasushi Nakai
Makito Miyake
Satoshi Anai
Kaori Yamaki
Tomomi Fujii
Masatoshi Hasegawa
Kiyohide Fujimoto
Source :
International Journal of Urology. Nov2020, Vol. 27 Issue 11, p1013-1017. 5p.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the dose evaluation parameters between conventional (using loose seed alone) and hybrid (using loose seeds in combination with stranded seeds) low-dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Methods: Between 2014 and July 2016, a total of 219 patients who underwent lowdose rate brachytherapy were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial (trial number: UMIN 000012780). Patients were randomized and allocated to two groups (conventional method vs hybrid method). Post-dosimetric parameters (%D90, minimal percentage of the dose received by 90% of the prostate gland; V100, percentage of the prostate volume receiving 100% of the prescribed minimal peripheral dose; V150, percentage of the prostate volume receiving 150% of the prescribed minimal peripheral dose; %UD30, minimal percentage of the dose received by 30% of the urethra; R100, rectal volume [mL] receiving 100% of the prescribed dose) calculated at 1 month after seed implantation by computed tomography scan were compared between the two groups, as well as the post-dosimetric parameters using the planning target volume of the prostate + 5-mm margin. Results: Regarding dose evaluation parameters, the prostate dose (%D90, V100, V150) and the urethral dose (%UD30) were not significantly different between the two groups, whereas V100 (+5-mm margin) and %D90 (+5-mm margin) were significantly higher in the hybrid method group compared with the conventional method group (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The present randomized study shows that the hybrid method of low-dose rate brachytherapy can achieve a higher coverage of the periprostatic region compared with the conventional method while maintaining an acceptable level of urethral and rectal doses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09198172
Volume :
27
Issue :
11
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
International Journal of Urology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
147655727
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.14349