Back to Search
Start Over
Impella Versus Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock.
- Source :
-
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine . Dec2020, Vol. 21 Issue 12, p1465-1471. 7p. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- <bold>Background: </bold>Percutaneous ventricular assist devices and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are increasingly used for mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in patients with acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) in hospitals throughout the United States.<bold>Methods: </bold>Using the National Inpatient Sample from October 2015 to December 2017, we identified hospital admissions that underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and non-elective Impella or ECMO placement for AMI-CS using ICD-10 codes. Propensity-score matching was performed to compare both groups for primary and secondary outcomes.<bold>Results: </bold>We identified 6290 admissions for AMI-CS who underwent PCI and were treated with Impella (n = 5730, 91%) or ECMO (n = 560, 9%) from October 2015 to December 2017. After propensity-match analysis, the ECMO cohort had significantly higher in-hospital mortality (43.3% vs 26.7%, OR: 2.10, p = 0.021). The incidence of acute respiratory failure and vascular complications were significantly lower in the Impella cohort. We observed a shorter duration of hospital stay and lower hospital costs in the Impella cohort compared to those who received ECMO.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>In AMI-CS, the use of Impella was associated with better clinical outcomes, fewer complications, shorter length of hospital stay and lower hospital cost compared to those undergoing ECMO placement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 15538389
- Volume :
- 21
- Issue :
- 12
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 147650381
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2020.05.042