Factors affecting the final outcomes after reconstruction of the median and ulnar nerve at the level of the forearm: Analysis of 41 patients.

<bold>Background: </bold>Upper extremity injuries have a significant impact on social and professional life. They represent about 10% of visits to emergency departments. Nerve lacerations are one of the biggest problem because loss of innervation results in muscle atrophy, decreased sensibility, and therefore permanent dysfunction. Appropriate treatment is very important for patients to regain function.<bold>Materials and Methods: </bold>The study included 41 patients, 30 men and 11 women who underwent nerve repair surgery in the middle and distal forearm level in the years 2001-2017. The patients' age ranged from 9 to 73 years with an average of 37 years. They were divided into 3 groups with repaired median, ulnar and both nerves. We determined time from injury to nerve repair, assessed sensitivity in index and little finger with a two-point discriminator, and muscle strength by measuring adduction of the little finger and palmar abduction of the thumb.Results were rated based on Medical Research Council Scale (MRC). In addition, general hand disability was assessed according to the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH).<bold>Results: </bold>There was a statistically significant (p = 0.0197), positive correlation (r > 0) between the period from injury to surgery and the DASH score, and statistically significant difference (p = 0.0001) in return of muscular function between groups with median, ulnar and both nerves injury. Also correlation between patients age and score of DASH was statistically significant (p = 0.0140) with positive correlation (r > 0). There was no statistically significant difference in the return of sensitivity (p = 0.4337) and the DASH score (p = 0.3831) between these three groups.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Patients with shorter time from injury to repair and at a younger age had better DASH results. The median nerve had the best motor function between the groups. There was no difference in sensitivity or DASH scores between groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]