Determination of one year stability of lipid plasma profile and comparison of blood collection tubes using UHPSFC/MS and HILIC-UHPLC/MS.

Effects of blood collection tubes, the time period, the sample origin, and the method used on the lipidomic profile are investigated by ultrahigh-performance supercritical fluid chromatography - mass spectrometry (UHPSFC/MS) and hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography - mass spectrometry (HILIC-UHPLC/MS). Heparin plasma samples have been obtained from 99 healthy volunteers at three time points separated by six-month intervals together with one collection for EDTA plasma and serum. Furthermore, lipid concentrations in heparin plasma collected at two different sites are compared. 171 lipid species from eight lipid classes are quantified with UHPSFC/MS, and 122 lipid species from four lipid classes with HILIC-UHPLC/MS. The accuracy of both methods is monitored by the quantitation error using two internal standards (IS) per individual lipid classes. No significant differences in lipid profiles are observed for different time points and types of collection tubes (heparin plasma, EDTA plasma, and serum). Most pronounced lipid concentration differences are observed for the comparison of NIST SRM 1950 human plasma and mean lipid concentrations of the investigated cohort. Furthermore, differences in lipid concentrations are observed between employed methods (UHPSFC/MS vs. HILIC-UHPLC/MS), which can be compensated by the normalization using NIST SRM 1950 human plasma used as the quality control sample. Image 1 • Quality control system is developed for the quality assurance of lipidomic quantitation. • Lipidomic profiles are less influenced by the type of blood collection tubes than by the effect of time and collection site. • Method dependent measurement bias can be compensated by the reference value normalization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]