Back to Search
Start Over
Petroleum and Fischer–Tropsch diesel soot: A comparison of morphology, nanostructure and oxidation reactivity.
- Source :
-
Fuel . Jan2021, Vol. 283, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p. - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- • The physical properties of CFT and ULSD soots are studied at various engine modes. • CFT produces the soot with smaller fractal dimensions and primary particle sizes. • CFT soot has more ordered nanostructure and lower reactivity than the ULSD soot. • The fringe length and tortuosity show definite correlations with soot reactivity. This study investigated the physical properties of the exhaust soot particles from a light-duty diesel engine fueled with an ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel (ULSD) and Fischer–Tropsch diesel fuel synthesized from coal (CFT). The morphology and nanostructure of the obtained soot were characterized using a high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, while the oxidation reactivity of soot was evaluated by the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Despite the different fuel properties, both the ULSD and CFT soot exhibits similar changes in fractal dimension, primary particle size and nanostructure parameters (including fringe length, separation distance and tortuosity) when varying the engine speed or load. However, the CFT soot has smaller fractal dimensions and primary particle sizes and a more ordered nanostructure as compared to the ULSD soot. The TGA results demonstrate that the CFT soot has the higher apparent activation energy, indicating that it is less reactive than the ULSD soot. The length and tortuosity of the fringes within the soot structure are found to have definite correlations with soot reactivity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- *SOOT
*DIESEL fuels
*FRACTAL dimensions
*PETROLEUM
*TRANSMISSION electron microscopy
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00162361
- Volume :
- 283
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Fuel
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 146786074
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118919