Back to Search Start Over

The Effectiveness of Cervical Medial Branch Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Facet Joint Syndrome in Patients Selected by a Practical Medial Branch Block Paradigm.

Authors :
Burnham, Taylor
Conger, Aaron
Salazar, Fabio
Petersen, Russell
Kendall, Richard
Cunningham, Shellie
Teramoto, Masaru
McCormick, Zachary L
Source :
Pain Medicine. Oct2020, Vol. 21 Issue 10, p2071-2076. 6p.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background Cervical medial branch radiofrequency ablation (CMBRFA) is an effective treatment for facetogenic pain in patients selected by Spine Intervention Society (SIS) guidelines of 100% symptom improvement with dual medial branch blocks (MBBs) ± placebo block. Patient selection for CMBRFA using ≥80% symptom improvement after dual concordant MBBs is common; however, this has not been studied. Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of CMBRFA and compare outcomes in individuals selected by 80–99% vs 100% symptom improvement with dual concordant MBBs. Design Cross-sectional cohort study. Methods Medical records of 87 consecutive patients were reviewed; 50 met inclusion criteria. A standardized telephone survey was performed at six or more months post-CMBRFA to query numerical rating scale (NRS) pain and patient global impression of change (PGIC) scores. The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients reporting ≥50% reduction of index pain. Results At a mean follow-up time of 16.9 ± 12.7 months, 54% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 35–73%) and 54% (95% CI = 32–74%) of the 80–99% and 100% MBBs groups, respectively, reported ≥50% pain reduction. Between-group comparison showed a relative risk of 0.99 (95% CI = 0.59–1.66) for meeting the primary outcome. Seventy percent (95% CI = 56–81%) of patients reported a PGIC score consistent with "improved or very much improved" at follow-up. Conclusions CMBRFA is an effective treatment in patients who report ≥80% symptom relief with dual concordant MBBs. The present study demonstrated an overall ≥50% pain reduction rate of 54% and no significant difference between those selected by 80–99% vs 100% symptom relief with dual concordant MBBs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15262375
Volume :
21
Issue :
10
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Pain Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
146706738
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnz358