Back to Search Start Over

Improvement of image quality and diagnostic confidence using Smart MAR - a projection-based CT protocol in patients with orthopedic metallic implants in hip, spine, and shoulder.

Authors :
Feldhaus, Felix W
Böning, Georg
Kahn, Johannes
Fehrenbach, Uli
Maurer, Martin
Renz, Diane
Streitparth, Florian
Source :
Acta Radiologica. Oct2020, Vol. 61 Issue 10, p1421-1430. 10p.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>In computed tomography (CT) scans, artifacts caused by metallic orthopedic implants still hamper the visualization of important, periprosthetic tissues. Smart MAR metal artifact reduction tool is a promising three-stage, projection-based, post-processing algorithm.<bold>Purpose: </bold>To determine whether the Smart MAR tool improves subjective and objective image quality and diagnostic confidence in patients with orthopedic implants of the hip, spine, and shoulder.<bold>Material and Methods: </bold>Seventy-two patients with orthopedic screws, hip/shoulder replacement, or spine spondylodesis were included. CT scans were performed on a single-source multislice CT scanner, raw data were post-processed using Smart MAR. Image quality was evaluated both quantitatively (ROI-based) and qualitatively (rater-based) and compared to iterative reconstructions (ASIR V). As comparative standard for artificial prosthetic breaks or loosening, follow-up examinations were used.<bold>Results: </bold>Smart MAR reconstructions of the hip (n = 23), spine (n = 26), and shoulder (n = 23) showed a significantly reduced attenuation and noise of regions adjacent to metallic implants (P<0.002). Subjective image quality (P<0.005, shoulder P = 0.038/P = 0.046) and overall diagnostic confidence were higher in Smart MAR (all regions P<0.002). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR; P = 0.72/P = 0.96) was not improved. Compared to standard ASIR V new, artificial metal extinctions (up to 50%) or periprosthetic hem lines (48%-73%) were introduced by Smart MAR.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>Smart MAR improved image quality of the hip, spine, and shoulder CT scans resulting in higher diagnostic confidence in evaluation of periprosthetic soft tissues. As shown for spine implants, it should be used with caution and as a complementary tool for evaluation of periprosthetic loosening or integrity of metal implant, as in many cases it introduced new artifacts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02841851
Volume :
61
Issue :
10
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Acta Radiologica
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
146464914
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185120903446