Back to Search Start Over

Respiration and CH4 fluxes in Tibetan peatlands are influenced by vegetation degradation.

Authors :
Ma, Weiwei
Li, Guang
Wu, Jianghua
Xu, Guorong
Wu, Jiangqi
Source :
CATENA. Dec2020, Vol. 195, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

• Vegetation degradation could decrease CH 4 emissions and increase Re fluxes. • Soil temperatures at 5 and 10 cm were the main controls on Re variability. • Soil temperature and water content were the main controls on CH4 emission. • Less CH 4 flux in vegetation degradation peatland was due to low soil water content. Vegetation plays a critical role in regulating ecosystem carbon (C) processes in peatlands, but vegetation faces serious degradation on the Tibetan Plateau, China. However, how vegetation degradation affects on carbon processes of peatlands remains unclear. Using the static chamber technique, we compared ecosystem respiration (Re) and methane (CH 4) fluxes for healthy vegetation (HV) and degraded vegetation (DV) during two growing seasons (2013 and 2014) on peatlands of the Tibetan Plateau. We also determined the dominant factors controlling Re and CH 4 fluxes. The average Re flux for DV (218.04 ± 95.08 mg C m-2h−1 in 2013 and 219.03 ± 140.96 mg C m-2h−1 in 2014) was considerably larger than that at the HV(163.78 ± 87.51 mg C m-2h−1 in 2013 and143.91 ± 84.44 mg C m-2h−1 in 2014), whereas the average CH 4 fluxes for DV (0.06 ± 0.20 mg C m-2h−1 in 2013 and 0.04 ± 0.07 mg C m-2h−1 in 2014) were significantly lower than the corresponding fluxes for HV (2.19 ± 2.05 mg C m-2h−1 in 2013 and 0.85 ± 0.95 mg C m-2h−1 in 2014). The Re fluxes for the two vegetative treatments had the same temporal trends, with the peaking flux observed in July 2014. The temporal patterns of CH 4 fluxes were similar to Re for two vegetation treatments where fluxes peaked in July 2014. Soil temperatures were found to be the primary factors influencing temporal Re fluxes. Soil temperatures and soil water content (SWC) were found to be the dominant factors influencing temporal CH 4 flux for HV, while the main control for CH 4 emission was the SWC for DV. Therefore, vegetative condition must be considered when estimating Re and CH 4 flux from peatlands, particularly under the current situation of climate warming. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03418162
Volume :
195
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
CATENA
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
146323819
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104789