Back to Search Start Over

Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of an innovative medical device for improving oral accessibility during oral examination in special-needs patients: A multicentric clinical trial.

Authors :
Mogenot, Mathieu
Hein-Halbgewachs, Laurence
Goetz, Christophe
Ouamara, Nadia
Droz-Desprez, Dominique
Strazielle, Catherine
Albecker, Sylvie
Mengus, Brigitte
Strub, Marion
Manière, Marie-Cécile
Richardin, Pascal
Wang, Stéphane
Piga, Giuseppa
Dalstein, Amélie
Anastasio, Daniel
Source :
PLoS ONE. 9/28/2020, Vol. 15 Issue 9, p1-19. 19p.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background: People with special needs have high unmet oral healthcare needs, partly because dentists find it difficult to access their oral cavity. The Oral Accessibility Spatula aims to improve oral accessibility. This prospective multicenter interventional open-label non-randomized patient-self-controlled trial assessed the ability of the spatula to improve the oral accessibility of special-needs patients during dental examinations. Methods: The cohort was a convenience sample of minor and adult patients with special needs due to physical, intellectual, and/or behavioral disorders who underwent dental check-up/treatment in five French tertiary hospitals/private clinics in 2016–2018 and evinced some (Venham-Score = 2–4) but not complete (Venham-Score = 5) resistance to oral examination. After inclusion, patients underwent oral examination without the spatula and then immediately thereafter oral examination with the spatula. Primary outcome was Oral Accessibility Score (0–12 points; higher scores indicate visualization and probing of the tooth sectors). Secondary outcomes were patient toleration (change in Venham-Score relative to first examination), safety, and Examiner Satisfaction Score (0–10; low scores indicate unsatisfactory examination). Results: The 201 patients were mostly non-elderly adults (18–64 years, 65%) but also included children (21%), adolescents (11%), and aged patients (3%). One-quarter, half, and one-quarter had Venham-Score = 2, 3, and 4 at inclusion, respectively. The spatula significantly improved Oral Accessibility Score (4.8 to 10.8), Venham-Score (3.1 to 2.6), and Examiner Satisfaction Score (3.4 to 7.2) (all p<0.001). There were no severe spatula-related adverse events. Conclusion: The spatula significantly improved oral access, was safe and well-tolerated by the patients, and markedly improved oral examination quality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19326203
Volume :
15
Issue :
9
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
PLoS ONE
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
146121644
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239898