Response to exercise‐induced blood pressure elevation is blunted in wrist‐cuff automated oscillometric measurement in healthy young college students.

Background: A wrist‐cuff automated oscillometric device is portable and useful for self‐monitoring of blood pressure (BP) at home and outdoors when an upper arm device is not available. Although the height of the forearm in wrist BP measurement is acknowledged to be the major cause of measurement error, it remains unclear whether exercise affects subsequent wrist BP measurement. Methods and Results: Ninety‐seven healthy college students (median age of 20 years with an age range of 19 to 36 years, 70.1% males) participated in this study. Care was taken to keep the position of the wrist at a level near the upper arm level in BP measurement. At rest, BP measured by a wrist‐cuff oscillometric device (Omron HEM‐6183) was generally acceptable when it was compared with BP measured by an upper arm oscillometric device (Omron HEM‐7130‐HP) and with BP measured by the auscultatory method using a mercury sphygmomanometer. However, the ratio of systolic BP measured by oscillometric devices just after a two‐step exercise test to that before exercise on the wrist (1.22 ± 0.14) was significantly lower than the ratio on the upper arm (1.27 ± 0.14), and the difference was significantly correlated with exercise‐induced increase in pulse rate (Spearman's ρ = 0.23), suggesting a possible role of autonomic nerve activity in the blunted response to exercise‐induced BP elevation in wrist BP measurement. Conclusions: The results indicate that the blunted response to exercise‐induced BP elevation should be considered in wrist BP measurement when using a wrist‐cuff oscillometric device. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]