Conditioned pain modulation in elite athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background and aims: Elite athletes reportedly have superior pain tolerances, but it is unclear if results extend to conditioned pain modulation (CPM). The aim of our study was to synthesize existing literature in order to determine whether CPM is increased in elite athletes compared to healthy controls. Methods: A systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis was conducted. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PubMed were searched for English-language studies that examined CPM in adult elite athlete populations. Results: Seven studies were identified; all were of poor to fair methodological quality. There was no overall difference in CPM between elite athletes and controls (Hedges g = 0.37, CI95 −0.03−0.76; p = 0.07). There was heterogeneity between studies, including one that reported significantly less CPM in elite athletes compared to controls. An exploratory meta-regression indicated that a greater number of hours trained per week was associated with higher CPM. Conclusions: The overall number and quality of studies was low. Despite nominally favoring higher CPM in elite athletes, aggregate results indicate no significant difference compared to healthy controls. A possible factor explaining the high degree of variability between studies is the number of hours elite athletes spent training. Implications: Based on available evidence, athletes do not have remarkable endogenous pain modulation compared to controls. High quality experimental studies are needed to address the effect of hours trained per week on CPM in athletes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]