Back to Search Start Over

CatBoost: A new approach for estimating daily reference crop evapotranspiration in arid and semi-arid regions of Northern China.

Authors :
Zhang, Yixiao
Zhao, Zhongguo
Zheng, Jianghua
Source :
Journal of Hydrology. Sep2020, Vol. 588, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

• The performances of CatBoost, GRNN and RF were assessed to estimate daily ET 0. • CatBoost model provided the most accurate results among the considered models. • GRNN model showed comparable estimates of daily ET 0 to the RF model. • The generalized analysis confirmed the results obtained in the local analysis. Establishing a computational model for accurate prediction of reference crop evapotranspiration (ET 0) is critical for regional water resources planning and irrigation scheduling design. FAO Penman-Monteith equation is recommended as the standard model to predict ET 0. However, its application is restricted by lack of complete meteorological data in many regions. This study evaluated the performance of CatBoost, an algorithm for gradient boosting on decision trees, for estimating daily ET 0 using limited meteorological data in arid and semi-arid regions of Northern China. The CatBoost model was further compared with their corresponding generalized regression neural network (GRNN) and random forests (RF) models. Eight input combinations of daily meteorological data including daily maximum air temperature (T max), daily minimum air temperature (T min), wind speed at 2 m height (u 2), relative humidity (RH) and net radiation (R n) from 15 weather stations during 1996–2015 were used to train and test the models. Four statistical indicators were used to evaluate the accuracy and performance of the models, including coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean bias error (MBE). The results showed that all the three models using T max , T min , u 2 and R n could obtain satisfactory ET 0 estimates in arid and semi-arid regions of Northern China with incomplete sets of data. For the local models, CatBoost (on average RMSE ranging 0.096–0.821 mm d−1) was superior to GRNN (on average RMSE ranging 0.206–0.847 mm d−1) and RF (on average RMSE ranging 0.169–0.866 mm d−1) under the same meteorological parameters as input. The results of the generalized models were similar to the local models, but the former ones performed worse than the latter ones. Overall, CatBoost is observed to be the best alternative for estimating ET 0 , which is helpful for irrigation scheduling in arid and semi-arid regions of Northern China and maybe elsewhere with similar climates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00221694
Volume :
588
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Hydrology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
145205788
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125087