MÂLİKÎ FIKIH USÛLÜNÜN TARİHSEL SÜRECİ.

After the emergence of methodology, each sect created an original methodology. Different methods emerged on the basis of different conceptions of the fuqaha in terms of method. In this context, Mâlikî methodology made publications in the early periods of compilation and codification of methodology works. Although Imam Malik does not possess any methodological works, his compilation titled el-Muvattâ in which the fatwa, fiqh, and hadith are compiled forms the basis for these methodology activities. The different perspectives of Medina, Egypt, Iraq, and Andalusia schools which emerged in the Malikian sect also affected the methodology of each school, and each school produced works within the framework of their own thoughts. The first methodological works were centered in Iraq and then an era of development through the Andalusian scholarship was observed, while the Egyptian school shaped the classical period of the Maliki methodology. Although the fuqaha and combined method were used in these processes, a compilation tradition was created mainly within the framework of the mutakallamin method. The Iraq Maliki methodology of which the basic characteristic is debate and opposition in terms of methodology, Andalusia methodology which contradicts with this approach, and Egypt methodology which fuses these two methods have been effective. The Andalusian methodology school and the Egyptian methodology which remained under the influence of Irâq in the final process and based on the Irâq methodology were the two main schools that continued their dominance in the sect. In the modern era, a maqasid-based methodology, which is very different from the classical method, became dominant. In the present article, a holistic and overall picture of the development course of the Maliki methodology will be presented while considering the peculiar features and historical process of these periods of the Maliki methodology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]