Soil magnetic susceptibility and its relationship with naturally occurring processes and soil attributes in pedosphere, in a tropical environment.

• Lithology, pedogenesis and relief affect soil magnetic susceptibility. • Pedogenesis strongly affect magnetic susceptibility on more evolved soil classes. • Lithology contribute more to magnetic susceptibility in less evolved soil classes. • Magnetic susceptibility had good correlation with soil texture, CEC and iron content. • Field sensor can be used in delimitation of soil classes and digital soil mapping. Soil magnetic susceptibility (κ) has potential to be used as a pedoenvironmental indicator from which mineralogy, pedogeochemical, pedogeomorphological and pedogenic processes can be inferred. It can be used in pedosphere studies, as an auxiliary information for appropriate and sustainable soil use and management. This research aimed to analyze how pedogenesis and geochemical processes affect the κ and some of its attributes, as well as its potential use in discriminating soil great groups, following the digital soil mapping approach. The study area is located in São Paulo State - Brazil. Soil samples were collected for physical–chemical analysis from 79 locations (0–20 cm depth). At these sites, magnetic susceptibility was measured with a portable field instrument and analyzed in terms of geology, relief and soil class. The results showed that geology strongly affects κ, mainly in diabase derived soils, followed by metamorphosed siltstone and siltstone. In fluvial sediments, the κ exhibits different behaviors due to different sediments deposited by the Capivari River. In less evolved soils, such as Cambisols, lithology is a more important contributor to κ than pedogenesis. In more evolved soils, pedogenesis increases κ, whereas argilluviation/ferralitization reduces it. The κ values did not decrease significantly or even increase downslope, due to the presence of diabase on the lower parts. Differences in κ where observed between diabase bedrock located in different parts of the study area, indicating more of an influence by geomorphic processes rather than lithology. With respect to soil attributes, positive correlations between κ and base saturation, cation exchange capacity, organic matter, and iron and clay content were found, whereas a negative correlation was found between κ and sand content. The κ correlates with changes in lithology and soil class demonstrating its application as a potential tool for the discrimination of soil great groups and digital soil mapping. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]