The Impact of Frailty on Long‐Term Patient‐Oriented Outcomes after Emergency General Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: Few studies examine the impact of frailty on long‐term patient‐oriented outcomes after emergency general surgery (EGS). We measured the prevalence of frailty among older EGS patients and examined the impact of frailty on 1‐year outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using 2008 to 2014 Medicare claims. SETTING: Acute care hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Patients 65 years or older who received one of the five EGS procedures with the highest mortality burden (partial colectomy, small bowel resection, peptic ulcer disease repair, adhesiolysis, or laparotomy). MEASUREMENTS: A validated claims‐based frailty index (CFI) identified patients who were not frail (CFI <.15), pre‐frail (.15 ≤ CFI <.25), mildly frail (.25 ≤ CFI <.35), and moderately to severely frail (CFI ≥.35). Multivariable Cox regression compared 1‐year mortality. Multivariable Poisson regression compared rates of post‐discharge hospital encounters (hospitalizations, intensive care unit stay, emergency department visit) and home time over 1 year after discharge. All regression models adjusted for age, sex, race, admission from facility, procedure, sepsis, inpatient palliative care delivery, trauma center designation, hospital bed size, and teaching status, and they were clustered by patient and hospital referral region. RESULTS: Among 468 459 older EGS adults, 37.4% were pre‐frail, 12.4% were mildly frail, and 3.6% were moderately to severely frail. Patients with mild frailty experienced a higher risk of 1‐year mortality compared with non‐frail patients (hazard ratio = 1.97; confidence interval [CI] = 1.94‐2.01). In the year after discharge, patients with mild and moderate to severe frailty had more hospital encounters compared with non‐frail patients (7.8 and 11.5 vs 2.0 per person‐year; incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 4.01; CI = 3.93‐4.08 vs IRR = 5.89; CI = 5.70‐6.09, respectively). Patients with mild and moderate to severe frailty also had fewer days at home in the year after discharge compared with non‐frail patients (256 and 203 vs 302 mean days; IRR =.97; CI =.96‐.97 vs IRR =.95; CI =.94‐.95, respectively). CONCLUSION: Older EGS patients with frailty are at increased risk for poor 1‐year outcomes and decreased home time. Targeted interventions for older EGS patients with frailty during the index EGS hospitalization are urgently needed to improve long‐term outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1037–1043, 2020 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]