Complete Versus Culprit only Revascularisation in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: Incidence and Outcomes from the London Heart Attack Group.

MLA

Rathod, Krishnaraj S., et al. “Complete Versus Culprit Only Revascularisation in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: Incidence and Outcomes from the London Heart Attack Group.” Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, vol. 21, no. 3, Mar. 2020, pp. 350–58. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2019.06.007.

APA

Rathod, K. S., Koganti, S., Jain, A. K., Rakhit, R., Dalby, M. C., Lockie, T., Kalra, S., Malik, I. S., Knight, C. J., Whitbread, M., Mathur, A., Firoozi, S., Bogle, R., Redwood, S., MacCarthy, P. A., Sirker, A., O’Mahony, C., Wragg, A., & Jones, D. A. (2020). Complete Versus Culprit only Revascularisation in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: Incidence and Outcomes from the London Heart Attack Group. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, 21(3), 350–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2019.06.007

Chicago

Rathod, Krishnaraj S., Sudheer Koganti, Ajay K. Jain, Roby Rakhit, Miles C. Dalby, Tim Lockie, Sundeep Kalra, et al. 2020. “Complete Versus Culprit Only Revascularisation in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: Incidence and Outcomes from the London Heart Attack Group.” Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine 21 (3): 350–58. doi:10.1016/j.carrev.2019.06.007.