Back to Search Start Over

The application of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography to the analysis of wildfire debris for ignitable liquid residue.

Authors :
Kates, Lisa N.
Richards, Philip I.
Sandau, Court D.
Source :
Forensic Science International. May2020, Vol. 310, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Arsonous wildfires are complex investigations due to the high abundance of natural background compounds and subsequent pyrolysis by-products formed during combustion. These interfering compounds can be present in large concentrations and overwhelm the marker compounds used to identify ignitable liquid residue (ILR). Complex matrix effects often interfere with the identification of ILR, providing ambiguous results. The use of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with time of flight mass spectrometry (GC×GC-TOFMS) separates natural compounds from interfering with ILR compounds of interest. When compared to standard gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis, GC×GC was able to reduce the number of tentative results by 20%. Certain compounds were determined to be unusable for the identification of ILR in wildfire debris samples, in particular the Three Musketeer Group (ethylbenzene, m,p-xylene, and o-xylene), which are ubiquitous in all samples, as well as long chain n-alkylbenzenes, which are formed in the pyrolysis of organic matter. Conversely, the presence of C1- and C2-alkylnaphthalenes were excellent indicators of the presence of gasoline-type ILR. A sizeable number of background samples were collected that helped to provide additional lines of evidence when classifying samples for ILR. Given the complicated matrices encountered in arsonous wildfires, it is evident that GC×GC provides better capabilities at identifying ILR than the standard GC-MS analytical technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03790738
Volume :
310
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Forensic Science International
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
142911633
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110256