Back to Search Start Over

Vacuum extraction delivery at first vaginal birth following cesarean: maternal and neonatal outcome.

Authors :
Rottenstreich, Misgav
Rotem, Reut
Katz, Biana
Rottenstreich, Amihai
Grisaru-Granovsky, Sorina
Source :
Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics. Feb2020, Vol. 301 Issue 2, p483-489. 7p. 1 Diagram, 4 Charts.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

<bold>Objective: </bold>To evaluate the maternal and neonatal morbidity outcome associated with vacuum assisted (VA) vaginal delivery at first vaginal birth following a previous cesarean delivery (CD).<bold>Study Design: </bold>This is a retrospective computerized study conducted at a single tertiary center, between 2005 and 2018. The study compared the morbidity outcome of VA vaginal delivery between two groups of parturients at their first vaginal birth; primigravid and those in second delivery with a prior cesarean. The primary outcome was the maternal adverse outcome: postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), anal sphincter injuries, retained placenta, shoulder dystocia, uterine rupture, and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. Secondary outcome was the neonatal adverse outcome: Apgar score, NICU admission, meconium aspiration, jaundice, sepsis, birth trauma, and death. Univariate analysis was followed by a multiple logistic regression model controlling for potential confounders, adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval).<bold>Results: </bold>During the study period, we identified 3695 parturients that engaged in Trial of labor after cesarean with no previous vaginal birth, among which 679 (18.4%) delivered by Vacuum (VA-VBAC). These were compared to 6544/43,083 (15.2%) primigravid delivered by Vacuum. The VA-VBAC group had higher risk of PPH (10.5% vs. 7.2%, p < 0.01), blood transfusions (5.6% vs. 3.5%, p < 0.01), retained placenta (10.2% vs. 4.7%, p < 0.01), and uterine rupture (0.4% vs. 0%, p < 0.01). The adverse neonatal outcomes were comparable among groups.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>The VA-VBAC has a higher risk of maternal postpartum hemorrhagic complications; preventive measures should be directed to this selected group of operative vaginal deliveries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09320067
Volume :
301
Issue :
2
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
141860232
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05443-3