Back to Search Start Over

Ten-year Mortality, Disease Progression, and Treatment-related Side Effects in Men with Localised Prostate Cancer from the ProtecT Randomised Controlled Trial According to Treatment Received.

Authors :
Neal, David E.
Metcalfe, Chris
Donovan, Jenny L.
Lane, J. Athene
Davis, Michael
Young, Grace J.
Dutton, Susan J.
Walsh, Eleanor I.
Martin, Richard M.
Peters, Tim. J.
Turner, Emma L.
Mason, Malcolm
Bollina, Prasad
Catto, James
Doherty, Alan
Gillatt, David
Gnanapragasam, Vincent
Holding, Peter
Hughes, Owen
Kockelbergh, Roger
Source :
European Urology. Mar2020, Vol. 77 Issue 3, p320-330. 11p.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

The ProtecT trial reported intention-to-treat analysis of men with localised prostate cancer (PCa) randomly allocated to active monitoring (AM), radical prostatectomy, and external beam radiotherapy. To determine report outcomes according to treatment received in men in randomised and treatment choice cohorts. This study focuses on secondary care. Men with clinically localised prostate cancer at one of nine UK centres were invited to participate in the treatment trial comparing AM, radical prostatectomy, and radiotherapy. Two cohorts included 1643 men who agreed to be randomised; 997 declined randomisation and chose treatment. Health-related quality of life impacts on urinary, bowel, and sexual function were assessed using patient-reported outcome measures. Analysis was carried out based on treatment received for each cohort and on pooled estimates using meta-analysis. Differences were estimated with adjustment for known prognostic factors using propensity scores. According to treatment received, more men receiving AM died of PCa (AM 1.85%, surgery 0.67%, radiotherapy 0.73%), whilst this difference remained consistent with chance in the randomised cohort (p = 0.08); stronger evidence was found in the exploratory analyses (randomised plus choice cohort) when AM was compared with the combined radical treatment group (p = 0.003). There was also strong evidence that metastasis (AM 5.6%, surgery 2.4%, radiotherapy 2.7%) and disease progression (AM 20.35%, surgery 5.87%, radiotherapy 6.62%) were more common in the AM group. Compared with AM, there were higher risks of sexual dysfunction (95% at 6 mo) and urinary incontinence (55% at 6 mo) after surgery, and of sexual dysfunction (88% at 6 mo) and bowel dysfunction (5% at 6 mo) after radiotherapy. The key limitations are the potential for bias when comparing groups defined by treatment received and outdating of the interventions being evaluated during the lengthy follow-up required in trials of screen-detected PCa. Analyses according to treatment received showed increased rates of disease-related events and lower rates of patient-reported harms in men managed by AM compared with men managed by radical treatment, and stronger evidence of greater PCa mortality in the AM group. More than 90 out of every 100 men with localised prostate cancer do not die of prostate cancer within 10 yr, irrespective of whether treatment is by means of monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy. Side effects on sexual and bladder function are much better after active monitoring, but the risks of spreading of prostate cancer are more common. Prostate cancer is very common, affecting about one in nine men during their lifetime, but most do not die or develop complications. The ProtecT trial randomised men with prostate-specific antigen-detected localised prostate cancer to active monitoring (AM), radical prostatectomy, or radiotherapy, and followed them up for 10 yr. We found that >90 out of every 100 men with localised prostate cancer do not die of prostate cancer within 10 yr, irrespective of whether treatment is by means of monitoring (AM), surgery, or radiotherapy. Side effects on sexual and bladder function are much better after AM than after radical treatments, but the risks of spreading of prostate cancer are greater after AM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03022838
Volume :
77
Issue :
3
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
European Urology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
141786686
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.10.030