Back to Search Start Over

Clinical outcomes following treatment of Enterobacter species pneumonia with piperacillin/tazobactam compared to cefepime or ertapenem.

Authors :
Holsen, Maya R.
Wardlow, Lynn C.
Bazan, Jose A.
Fussner, Lynn A.
Coe, Kelci E.
Elefritz, Jessica L.
Source :
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. Dec2019, Vol. 54 Issue 6, p824-828. 5p.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Enterobacter spp. are a common cause of nosocomial pneumonia and treatment can be complicated by AmpC resistance. Carbapenems are the treatment of choice; however, alternatives are needed. Cefepime has been shown to be non-inferior to carbapenems. There are limited data to support the use of piperacillin/tazobactam. The objective of this study was to determine if piperacillin/tazobactam is non-inferior to cefepime or ertapenem for Enterobacter pneumonia treatment. To compare the rate of clinical cure in patients with Enterobacter pneumonia receiving definitive treatment with piperacillin/tazobactam, cefepime, or ertapenem. Secondary outcomes included hospital mortality, infection-related length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, recurrent pneumonia, and resistance. Retrospective, single-center study. Of 114 patients included, 59 received definitive treatment with piperacillin/tazobactam and 55 received cefepime or ertapenem. There was no difference in the proportion of patients who achieved clinical cure in the piperacillin/tazobactam group compared to the cefepime or ertapenem group (76.3% vs. 87.3%, P = 0.13). Treatment group was not associated with clinical cure when controlling for confounders in multivariable logistic regression (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15-2.37). The rate of recurrent pneumonia was 11.4% in the piperacillin/tazobactam group and 6.7% in the cefepime or ertapenem group (P = 0.48). Other secondary outcomes did not differ between the groups. In this retrospective study of patients with Enterobacter pneumonia, clinical cure with piperacillin/tazobactam was comparable to that with cefepime or ertapenem; however, a prospective trial with a larger population is needed to determine if definitive treatment with piperacillin/tazobactam is non-inferior to definitive treatment with cefepime or ertapenem. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09248579
Volume :
54
Issue :
6
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
141606083
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.07.008