Back to Search Start Over

Comparative study of three types of lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors :
Zhang, Shuangping
Zhang, Peng
Guo, Shiping
Lian, Jianhong
Chen, Yun
Chen, Ailan
Ma, Yong
Li, Feng
Source :
Thoracic Cancer. Feb2020, Vol. 11 Issue 2, p224-231. 8p.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to compare three kinds of lymphadenectomy methods along the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) and assess the safety and effectiveness of the new method. Methods: A total of 194 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) at our institution from May 2013 to May 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the method of lymphadenectomy along the left RLN, the patients were divided into three groups: 75 cases underwent the conventional method (A group), 80 cases the skeletonized method (B group) and 39 cases the modified Bascule method (C group). The number of dissected lymph nodes and surgical outcomes were recorded and compared to identify differences among the three groups. Results: The frequency of metastasis to the LRLN lymph node was 18.6% among all patients, and 12%, 20% and 28% in groups A, B and C, respectively. The number of harvested lymph nodes (total/chest/LRLN/LRLN+) in group B and group C were significantly greater than that of group A, but not significant between group B and group C. The hoarseness rate in group C was 15.4%, which was lower than the rate in group B (21.3%) and higher than the rate in group A (13.3%), but there was no statistical significance. Conclusions: The new method for lymphadenectomy along the left RLN during MIE in the semiā€prone position is safe and reliable. It provides sufficient lymph node dissection along the left RLN. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17597706
Volume :
11
Issue :
2
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Thoracic Cancer
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
141526862
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13210