Back to Search
Start Over
Why purists should be infallibilists.
- Source :
-
Philosophical Studies . Mar2020, Vol. 177 Issue 3, p689-704. 16p. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Two of the most orthodox ideas in epistemology are fallibilism and purism. According to the fallibilist, one can know that a particular claim is true even though one's justification for that claim is less than fully conclusive. According to the purist, knowledge does not depend on practical factors. Fallibilism and purism are widely assumed to be compatible; in fact, the combination of these views has been called the 'ho-hum,' obvious, traditional view of knowledge. But I will argue that fallibilism and purism are incompatible. The best explanation for fallibilism requires one to reject purism, while maintaining purism should lead one to reject fallibilism. It follows that the orthodox view of knowledge is deeply mistaken. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- *THEORY of knowledge
*FALLIBILISM
*JUSTIFICATION (Ethics)
*PRAGMATICS
*ETHICS
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00318116
- Volume :
- 177
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Philosophical Studies
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 141384517
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1200-x