KAZAKİSTAN'DA YAPILMIŞ KUTADGU BİLİG ÇALIŞMALARININ KRONOLOJİK KAYNAKÇASI HAKKINDA BİR DENEME.

The 950th anniversary of Kutadgu Bilig's writing by Yusuf Has Hacib was included in the UNESCO Commemoration and Celebration Anniversaries program in 2019. Kutadgu Bilig, which is one of the most important works of Turkish literature in Islamic period and which contains information about Turkish culture, politics and literature life, is of great importance in world culture and literature and it is worth investigating in different countries of the world. To date, fourteen chronological bibliography studies have been published on Kutadgu Bilig. According to others, Ramiz Asker's bibliographic study in 2016 included a large part of Kutadgu Bilig research in Kazakhstan. However, there are important bibliographies that are not taken into consideration. In 2016, Kutadgu Bilig Research History published by Gülnisa Jamal and Muhammet Savaç Kafkasyalı mentioned only a part of Kutadgu Bilig works in Kazakhstan. Therefore, it is very important to consider the academic studies conducted in Kazakhstan about Balasagunlu Yusuf and his Kutadgu Bilig work. In this article, Kutadgu Bilig studies conducted in Kazakhstan are examined under four titles based on books, master's and doctoral thesis, articles and papers. The book; book chapters, quotations and reviews. The first studies on Kutadgu Bilig in Kazakhstan were included in the textbooks as a chapter before the special book. In the thesis part, master's and doctoral theses in literature, linguistics, education and philosophy which evaluate Yusuf Has Hacib and his work Kutadgu Bilig are discussed. In the article section, the studies in Belleten and research journals of universities and institutes in Kazakhstan are shown. In addition, Kutadgu Bilig studies, which were presented as papers in scientific conferences held in Kazakhstan and throughout the country, were listed. As a result, twenty-one books, twenty theses, forty-nine articles and one hundred twenty-eight papers were identified. In the study, the sources written in Cyrillic alphabet are transferred to Latin letters. The first publications are shown in the chronological bibliography. In addition, anthological works, reprinted publications and newspaper articles in which Kutadgu Bilig is also a sample of Kazakh transcriptions are not included. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]