Back to Search Start Over

Maze Made Easy: Better and easier measurement of incremental processing difficulty.

Authors :
Boyce, Veronica
Futrell, Richard
Levy, Roger P.
Source :
Journal of Memory & Language. Apr2020, Vol. 111, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

• We introduce A-maze, a Maze task with auto-generated real-word distractors. • We show that Maze tasks can be run over the web on crowdsourced participants. • A-maze and traditional G-maze both have high sensitivity in web-based experiments. Behavioral measures of incremental language comprehension difficulty form a crucial part of the empirical basis of psycholinguistics. The two most common methods for obtaining these measures have significant limitations: eye tracking studies are resource-intensive, and self-paced reading can yield noisy data with poor localization. These limitations are even more severe for web-based crowdsourcing studies, where eye tracking is infeasible and self-paced reading is vulnerable to inattentive participants. Here we make a case for broader adoption of the Maze task, involving sequential forced choice between each successive word in a sentence and a contextually inappropriate distractor. We leverage natural language processing technology to automate the most researcher-laborious part of Maze – generating distractor materials – and show that the resulting A(uto)-Maze method has dramatically superior statistical power and localization for well-established syntactic ambiguity resolution phenomena. We make our code freely available online for widespread adoption of A-maze by the psycholinguistics community. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0749596X
Volume :
111
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Memory & Language
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
141279722
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.104082