Back to Search Start Over

Outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with cancer.

Authors :
Quintana, Raymundo A.
Monlezun, Dominique J.
Davogustto, Giovanni
Saenz, Humberto R.
Lozano-Ruiz, Francisco
Sueta, Daisuke
Tsujita, Kenichi
Landes, Uri
Denktas, Ali E.
Alam, Mahboob
Paniagua, David
Addison, Daniel
Jneid, Hani
Source :
International Journal of Cardiology. Feb2020, Vol. 300, p106-112. 7p.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Randomized clinical trials demonstrated the benefits of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in diverse clinical settings. Patients with cancer were not routinely included in these studies. Literature search of PubMed, Cochrane, Medline, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials was conducted to identify studies that assessed one-year all-cause, cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality in patients with historical or active cancer. Using the random effects model, we computed risk ratios (RRs) and standardized mean differences and their 95% confidence intervals for the dichotomous and continuous measures and outcomes, respectively. Of 171 articles evaluated in total, 5 eligible studies were included in this meta-analysis. In total, 33,175 patients receiving PCI were analyzed, of whom 3323 patients had cancer and 29,852 no cancer history. Patients in the cancer group had greater all-cause mortality [RR 2.22 (1.51–3.26; p < 0.001)], including cardiovascular mortality [RR 1.34 (1.1–1.65; p = 0.005)] and non-cardiovascular mortality [RR 3.42 (1.74–6.74; p ≤ 0.001], at one-year compared to non-cancer patients. Patients in the cancer group had greater one-month all-cause mortality [RR 2.01 (1.24–3.27; p = 0.005)] and greater non-cardiovascular mortality [RR 6.87 (3.10–15.21; p ≤0.001)], but no difference in one-month cardiovascular mortality compared to non-cancer patients. Meta-regression analyses showed that the difference in one-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality between both groups was not attributable to differences in baseline characteristics, index PCI characteristics, or medications prescribed at discharge. Patients with cancer undergoing PCI have worse mid-term outcomes compared to non-cancer patients. Cancer patients should be managed by a multi-specialist team, in an effort to close the mortality gap. • First meta-analysis of outcomes after PCI in cancer patients • In total, 33,175 patients receiving PCI were analyzed in this study. • Cancer patients were found to have increased risk of 1-year all-cause mortality. • Cancer patients have increased risk of 1-year cardiovascular mortality. • In meta-regression, 1-year outcomes differences were independent of baseline traits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01675273
Volume :
300
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
International Journal of Cardiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
141152697
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.09.016