Back to Search Start Over

Reduced Leaflet Motion after Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement.

Authors :
De Backer, Ole
Dangas, George D.
Jilaihawi, Hasan
Leipsic, Jonathon A.
Terkelsen, Christian J.
Makkar, Raj
Kini, Annapoorna S.
Veien, Karsten T.
Abdel-Wahab, Mohamed
Kim, Won-Keun
Balan, Prakash
Van Mieghem, Nicolas
Mathiassen, Ole N.
Jeger, Raban V.
Arnold, Martin
Mehran, Roxana
Guimarães, Ana H. C.
Nørgaard, Bjarne L.
Kofoed, Klaus F.
Blanke, Philipp
Source :
New England Journal of Medicine. 1/9/2020, Vol. 382 Issue 2, p130-139. 10p.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>Subclinical leaflet thickening and reduced leaflet motion of bioprosthetic aortic valves have been documented by four-dimensional computed tomography (CT). Whether anticoagulation can reduce these phenomena after transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) is not known.<bold>Methods: </bold>In a substudy of a large randomized trial, we randomly assigned patients who had undergone successful TAVR and who did not have an indication for long-term anticoagulation to a rivaroxaban-based antithrombotic strategy (rivaroxaban [10 mg] plus aspirin [75 to 100 mg] once daily) or an antiplatelet-based strategy (clopidogrel [75 mg] plus aspirin [75 to 100 mg] once daily). Patients underwent evaluation by four-dimensional CT at a mean (±SD) of 90±15 days after randomization. The primary end point was the percentage of patients with at least one prosthetic valve leaflet with grade 3 or higher motion reduction (i.e., involving >50% of the leaflet). Leaflet thickening was also assessed.<bold>Results: </bold>A total of 231 patients were enrolled. At least one prosthetic valve leaflet with grade 3 or higher motion reduction was found in 2 of 97 patients (2.1%) who had scans that could be evaluated in the rivaroxaban group, as compared with 11 of 101 (10.9%) in the antiplatelet group (difference, -8.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -16.5 to -1.9; P = 0.01). Thickening of at least one leaflet was observed in 12 of 97 patients (12.4%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 33 of 102 (32.4%) in the antiplatelet group (difference, -20.0 percentage points; 95% CI, -30.9 to -8.5). In the main trial, the risk of death or thromboembolic events and the risk of life-threatening, disabling, or major bleeding were higher with rivaroxaban (hazard ratios of 1.35 and 1.50, respectively).<bold>Conclusions: </bold>In a substudy of a trial involving patients without an indication for long-term anticoagulation who had undergone successful TAVR, a rivaroxaban-based antithrombotic strategy was more effective than an antiplatelet-based strategy in preventing subclinical leaflet-motion abnormalities. However, in the main trial, the rivaroxaban-based strategy was associated with a higher risk of death or thromboembolic complications and a higher risk of bleeding than the antiplatelet-based strategy. (Funded by Bayer; GALILEO-4D ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02833948.). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00284793
Volume :
382
Issue :
2
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
New England Journal of Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
141144053
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1911426