Back to Search Start Over

Detection and quantification of human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus in cadaveric tissue donors using different molecular tests.

Authors :
Ribeiro, Victoria Stadler Tasca
Raboni, Sonia Mara
Suss, Paula Hansen
Cieslinski, Juliette
Kraft, Letícia
dos Santos, Jucélia Stadinicki
Pereira, Luciane
Tuon, Felipe Francisco
Source :
Journal of Clinical Virology. Dec2019, Vol. 121, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

• Transmission of infectious diseases can occur in organ and tissue transplantations. • NAT tests can detect the viruses sooner than serologic tests. • Cadaveric blood specimens are usually of poor quality, with inhibition factors. • There is a lack of available and validated tests for cadaveric specimens in Brazil. • Assays have a wide variability to accurately provide results on cadaveric specimens. Tissues from cadaveric donors are used in several clinical circumstances, and the transmission of infectious diseases has been reported. Cadaveric donor (CD) blood sample analysis is challenging due to its poor quality. However, studies have demonstrated the usefulness of molecular based methods, and the lack of studies using available commercial molecular tests was reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance, specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of different commercial molecular tests for HIV and HCV detection and quantification in CD through spiked samples. 20 CD and 20 blood donor samples were tested using 1,000 copies/mL and 1,000 IU/mL of lyophilized standards of HIV and HCV, respectively. Samples were analyzed by different molecular kits: XPERT HCV Viral Load and HIV-1 (Cepheid), COBAS® TaqMan® HIV-1 and COBAS® TaqMan® HCV Test, v2.0 (Roche), and artus® HI Virus-1 QS-RGQ and artus® HCV RG RT-PCR Kit (Qiagen). HIV and HCV in CD were detected by RT-PCR-based quantitative kits. The tests performed by the Cepheid and the Roche kits showed the most accurate, sensitive and specific results, however, a wide variability between the assays and kits was observed. The Qiagen kits did not demonstrate satisfactory results. CD evaluation showed great variability. The Cepheid and Roche kits were more sensitive for detecting HIV on CD and Cepheid was the most efficient kit for HCV quantification in CD. The Roche and Cepheid kits can be used to screen tissue donors for HIV and HCV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13866532
Volume :
121
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Clinical Virology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
140937150
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2019.104203