Back to Search Start Over

Evaluation of two nutritional scores' association with systemic treatment toxicity and survival in metastatic colorectal cancer: an AGEO prospective multicentre study.

Authors :
Gallois, Claire
Artru, Pascal
Lièvre, Astrid
Auclin, Edouard
Lecomte, Thierry
Locher, Christophe
Marthey, Lysiane
Zaimi, Yosra
Faroux, Roger
Pernot, Simon
Barret, Maximilien
Taieb, Julien
Source :
European Journal of Cancer. Sep2019, Vol. 119, p35-43. 9p.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) is currently the standard nutritional assessment tool for patients with cancer. In a retrospective assessment of a prospective cohort, we showed that the Nutritional Risk Index (NRI) seemed to be associated with treatment toxicity and survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The objective of this study was to compare these two nutritional tools (PG-SGA and NRI) on their correlation with chemotherapy-related toxicity and survival in non–pre-treated patients with mCRC. This prospective multicentre observational study enrolled non–pre-treated patients with mCRC. PG-SGA and NRI were performed at the onset of first-line chemotherapy. Treatment-related toxicities were registered according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria Adverse Event version 4.0. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the start of treatment. A total of 168 patients were included from eight French centres. Patients were considered malnourished in 41% of cases according to PG-SGA and 56% of cases according to the NRI. In multivariate analysis, malnutrition according to PG-SGA was significantly associated with chemotherapy-related grade ≥2 clinical toxicities (odds ratio: 3.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7–8.4; p = 0.001) and OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.3–5.3; p = 0.006), but not with PFS (HR: 1.5; 95% CI: 0.8–2.6; p = 0.2). Conversely, malnutrition according to the NRI was not significantly associated with these tolerance and efficacy parameters. Although more complex to perform in daily oncology practice, the PG-SGA score appears to be the best nutritional assessment tool because of its strong association with clinically relevant oncological outcomes such as OS and treatment-related toxicities in patients with mCRC. • In colorectal cancer (CRC), malnutrition is associated with chemotherapy-related toxicities. • In CRC, malnutrition is associated with decreased overall survival. • Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment should now be the standard nutritional assessment for patients with metastatic CRC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09598049
Volume :
119
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
European Journal of Cancer
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
138725693
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.07.011