Back to Search Start Over

Understanding gender differences in STEM: Evidence from college applications✰.

Authors :
Delaney, Judith M.
Devereux, Paul J.
Source :
Economics of Education Review. Oct2019, Vol. 72, p219-238. 20p.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

• This paper examines why women are less likely to study STEM in college. • We use administrative data for all secondary school students who apply for college in Ireland. • Find a 22 percentage points raw gender gap that is concentrated in the areas of engineering, technology, and mathematics. • Subject choice in secondary school is the most important predictor of the portion of the gap that can be explained, with a small role for grades achieved in mathematics versus English. • A gender gap of 9% remains even among students who studied the same subjects and achieved the same grades at secondary school. • Find a much smaller gap when we include nursing degrees in STEM. While education levels of women have increased dramatically relative to men, women are still greatly underrepresented in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) college programmes. We use unique data on preference rankings for all secondary school students who apply for college in Ireland and detailed information on school subjects and grades to decompose the sources of the gender gap in STEM. We find that, of the 22 percentage points raw gap, about 13 percentage points is explained by differential subject choices and grades in secondary school. Subject choices are more important than grades – we estimate male comparative advantage in STEM (as measured by subject grades) explains about 3 percentage points of the gender gap. Additionally, differences in overall achievement between girls and boys have a negligible effect. Strikingly, there remains a gender gap of 9 percentage points even for persons who have identical preparation at the end of secondary schooling (in terms of both subjects studied and grades achieved); however, this gap is only 4 percentage points for STEM-ready students. We find that gender gaps are smaller among high-achieving students and for students who go to school in more affluent areas. There is no gender gap in science (the large gaps are in engineering and technology), and we also find a smaller gender gap when we include nursing degrees in STEM, showing that the definition of STEM used is an important determinant of the conclusions reached. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02727757
Volume :
72
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Economics of Education Review
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
138669834
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2019.06.002