Back to Search Start Over

Edoxaban in Asian Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Effectiveness and Safety.

Authors :
Lee, So-Ryoung
Choi, Eue-Keun
Han, Kyung-Do
Jung, Jin-Hyung
Oh, Seil
Lip, Gregory Y H
Source :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). Aug2018, Vol. 72 Issue 8, p838-853. 16p.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>It is unclear whether edoxaban shows better risk reduction of ischemic stroke, bleeding, and all-cause mortality than warfarin in Asian patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF).<bold>Objectives: </bold>This study compared the effectiveness and safety of edoxaban with those of warfarin in a Korean population with AF.<bold>Methods: </bold>Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, we included new users of edoxaban and warfarin in patients with AF from January 2014 to December 2016 (n = 4,200 on edoxaban, and n = 31,565 on warfarin) and analyzed the risk of ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), hospitalization for gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, hospitalization for major bleeding, and all-cause death. The propensity score matching method was used to balance covariates across edoxaban and warfarin users.<bold>Results: </bold>We compared a 1:3 propensity score-matched cohort of patients with AF who were new users of edoxaban and warfarin (n = 4,061 and n = 12,183, respectively). Baseline characteristics were balanced between the 2 groups (median age 72 years; median CHA2DS2-VASc [congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke, transient ischemic attack, or thromboembolism, vascular disease, age 65-74 years, sex category (female)] score 3). Edoxaban users had a significantly lower risk of ischemic stroke (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.693; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.487 to 0.959), ICH (HR: 0.407; 95% CI: 0.182 to 0.785), hospitalization for GI bleeding (HR: 0.597; 95% CI: 0.363 to 0.930), hospitalization for major bleeding (HR: 0.532; 95% CI: 0.352 to 0.773), and all-cause death (HR: 0.716; 95% CI: 0.549 to 0.918) than warfarin users. All subgroups (age, sex, CHA2DS2-VASc score, renal function, edoxaban dose) showed better clinical outcomes with edoxaban than with warfarin.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>In this real-world Asian population with AF, edoxaban might be associated with reduced risk of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and all-cause death compared with warfarin. These benefits were consistent across various high-risk subgroups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
07351097
Volume :
72
Issue :
8
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
138361926
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.05.066