Back to Search Start Over

Laboratory comparison between cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay and ultrasensitive single molecule counting technology for detection of Clostridioides difficile toxins A and B, PCR, enzyme immunoassays, and multistep algorithms.

Authors :
Sandlund, Johanna
Mills, Ray
Griego-Fullbright, Christen
Wagner, Aaron
Estis, Joel
Bartolome, Amelita
Almazan, Anna
Tam, Stanley
Biscocho, Sheryl
Abusali, Salina
Nolan, Niamh
Bishop, Jeffrey J.
Todd, John
Young, Stephen
Source :
Diagnostic Microbiology & Infectious Disease. Sep2019, Vol. 95 Issue 1, p20-24. 5p.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Diagnostic tests for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) lack either specificity (nucleic acid amplification tests) or sensitivity (enzyme immunoassays; EIAs). The performance of the Singulex Clarity® C. diff toxins A/B assay was compared to cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay. Testing was also performed using an EIA for glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and C. difficile toxins A and B (C. Diff Quik Chek Complete®), polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (BD MAX™ Cdiff Assay), and 2 multistep algorithms: algorithm 1 (discordant GDH/toxin results arbitrated by PCR) and algorithm 2 (PCR-positive samples tested with toxin EIA). The Clarity assay and PCR both had 97% sensitivity, while specificity was 100% for Clarity and 79% for PCR. Algorithm 1 yielded 41% discordant results, and both toxin EIA and algorithm 2 had 58% sensitivity. Median toxin concentrations, as measured by the Clarity C. difficile toxin assay, were 3590, 11.5, 0.4, and 0 pg/mL for GDH+/toxin+, GDH+/toxin−/PCR+, GDH+/toxin−/PCR−, and GDH−/toxin− samples, respectively (P < 0.001). The Clarity assay may offer a single-test solution for CDI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
07328893
Volume :
95
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Diagnostic Microbiology & Infectious Disease
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
138056750
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.04.002