Back to Search Start Over

The formation and evolution of the paleo-Pearl River and its influence on the source of the northern South China sea.

Authors :
Ma, Ming
Chen, Guojun
Lyu, Chengfu
Zhang, Gongcheng
Li, Chao
Yan, Yingkai
Ma, Zunqing
Source :
Marine & Petroleum Geology. Aug2019, Vol. 106, p171-189. 19p.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

The paleo-Pearl River has been suggested as one of the major source terrains for the northern South China Sea, which headstreams in the hinterland of the Tibetan Plateau and flows through the South China Block, eventually discharges into the Pearl River Mouth Basin (PRMB) of the South China Sea (SCS). However, the drainage history of the paleo-Pearl River remains a matter of debate. Detrital zircon U Pb ages, trace elements, Nd and Sr isotopes and clay minerals from the Eocene to Miocene sediments in the Pearl River Mouth Basin of the South China Sea have been used to investigate the sedimentary provenance and reconstruct the drainage history of the paleo-Pearl River. The Eu/Eu*, La/Sc, La/Co, Th/Sc and Th/Co ratios, the Hf La/Th and La/Sc-Co/Th diagrams, and the chondrite normalized REE patterns of the samples suggested that the Eocene to Miocene sediments were mainly derived from felsic source rock. The Lower Eocene sediments were mainly provided by the intrabasinal uplift regions. The Dong River and Bei River initiated since Upper Eocene supplied large amounts of felsic detritus from the Southern China Coast to Zhu Ⅰ Depression, and then transported sediments into the Zhu Ⅱ depression during the upper Early Oligocene. The Nd and Sr isotopes of the sediments suggested that the Liu River may not provide sediments for the PRMB, however, the Gui River may have made a very small contribution. The Nd and Sr isotopes of the sediments also suggested that the paleo-Pearl River began to extend westward to form Xi River and eventually the Hongshui River in the Late Oligocene. The trace element ratios of the samples also suggested that the Miocene sediments may have received more input from an intermediate rock area, indicating the main provenance switch from the coast of South China to a northern source during this time. This conclusion has been supported by the detrital zircon U Pb ages, Nd and Sr isotopes and clay minerals data of the samples, which show that the provenance of the sediments supplied by the paleo-Pearl River had an abrupt shift in the Middle Miocene. The southeastern Tibetan Plateau rapid uplifted and experienced erosion in the Middle Miocene, leading to the progressive headward erosion of the Pearl River system into the continental interior. Detrital zircon U Pb ages, trace elements, Nd and Sr isotopes and clay minerals of Eocene to Miocene samples for the PRMB have been used to determine the provenance of the PRMB and reconstruct the evolutionary history of the paleo-Pearl River. The following conclusions can be made: (1) The Oligocene to Miocene sediments transported by the paleo-Pearl River were derived from felsic source rock and the Miocene sediments may have received more input from intermediate rock area. (2) The Liu River might not provide sediments for the PRMB and the Gui River might have made a very small contribution. The paleo-Pearl River began to extend westward to form the Xi River and eventually the Hongshui River was formed during the Late Oligocene. (3) Trace elements and Nd and Sr isotopes of the samples indicated that the western tributaries of the Pearl River did act as important sediment supplier since Early Miocene and lasted to Middle Miocene. (4) The provenance abrupt change in the Middle Miocene probably resulted from the rapid uplift of the southeastern Tibetan Plateau, leading to the progressive headward erosion of the Pearl River system into the continental interior on the basis of the Early Miocene. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02648172
Volume :
106
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Marine & Petroleum Geology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
136842876
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.04.035