Reconstructing Greater India: Paleogeographic, kinematic, and geodynamic perspectives.

Key in understanding the geodynamics governing subduction and orogeny is reconstructing the paleogeography of 'Greater India', the Indian plate lithosphere that subducted since Tethyan Himalayan continental collision with Asia. Here, we discuss this reconstruction from paleogeographic, kinematic, and geodynamic perspectives and isolate the evolution scenario that is consistent with all three. We follow recent constraints advocating a ~58 Ma initial collision and update a previous kinematic restoration of intra-Asian shortening with a recently proposed model that reconciles long-debated large and small estimates of Indochina extrusion. Our new reconstruction is tested against paleomagnetic data, and against seismic tomographic constraints on paleo-subduction zone locations. The resulting restoration shows ~1000–1200 km of post-collisional intra-Asian shortening, leaving a 2600–3400 km wide Greater India. From a paleogeographic, sediment provenance perspective, Eocene sediments in the Lesser Himalaya and on undeformed India may be derived from Tibet, suggesting that all Greater Indian lithosphere was continental, but may alternatively be sourced from the contemporaneous western Indian orogen unrelated to India-Asia collision. A quantitative kinematic, paleomagnetic perspective prefers major Cretaceous extension and a 'Greater India Basin' opening within Greater India, but data uncertainty may speculatively allow for minimal extension. Finally, from a geodynamic perspective, assuming a fully continental Greater India would require that subduction rates close to 20 cm/yr was driven by a down-going lithosphere-crust assemblage more buoyant than the mantle, which seems physically improbable. We conclude that the Greater India Basin scenario is the only sustainable one from all three perspectives. We infer that old pre-collisional lithosphere rapidly entered the lower mantle sustaining high subduction rates, whilst post-collisional continental and young Greater India basin lithosphere did not, inciting the rapid India-Asia convergence deceleration ~8 Myr after collision. Subsequent absolute northward slab migration and overturning caused flat slab subduction, Tibetan shortening, arc migration and arc volume decrease. Unlabelled Image • Following 58 Ma India-Asia collision, Asia shortening 1000-1200 km and 2600-3400 km of (Greater) India subducted • Combined paleogeographic, kinematic, and geodynamic constraints strongly suggest a Greater India Basin scenario • Post-58 Ma upper mantle slab buckling induced flat slab subduction causing India-Asia slowdown and Tibetan shortening [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]