Back to Search
Start Over
Accuracy of Fractional Flow Reserve Derived From Coronary Angiography.
- Source :
-
Circulation . 1/22/2019, Vol. 139 Issue 4, p477-484. 8p. - Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- <bold>Background: </bold>Measuring fractional flow reserve (FFR) with a pressure wire remains underutilized because of the invasiveness of guide wire placement or the need for a hyperemic stimulus. FFR derived from routine coronary angiography (FFRangio) eliminates both of these requirements and displays FFR values of the entire coronary tree. The FFRangio Accuracy versus Standard FFR (FAST-FFR) study is a prospective, multicenter, international trial with the primary goal of determining the accuracy of FFRangio.<bold>Methods: </bold>Coronary angiography was performed in a routine fashion in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. FFR was measured in vessels with coronary lesions of varying severity using a coronary pressure wire and hyperemic stimulus. Based on angiograms of the respective arteries acquired in ≥2 different projections, on-site operators blinded to FFR then calculated FFRangio using proprietary software. Coprimary end points were the sensitivity and specificity of the dichotomously scored FFRangio for predicting pressure wire-derived FFR using a cutoff value of 0.80. The study was powered to meet prespecified performance goals for sensitivity and specificity.<bold>Results: </bold>Ten centers in the United States, Europe, and Israel enrolled a total of 301 subjects and 319 vessels meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria which were included in the final analysis. The mean FFR was 0.81 and 43% of vessels had an FFR≤0.80. The per-vessel sensitivity and specificity were 94% (95% CI, 88% to 97%) and 91% (86% to 95%), respectively, both of which exceeded the prespecified performance goals. The diagnostic accuracy of FFRangio was 92% overall and remained high when only considering FFR values between 0.75 to 0.85 (87%). FFRangio values correlated well with FFR measurements ( r=0.80, P<0.001) and the Bland-Altman 95% confidence limits were between -0.14 and 0.12. The device success rate for FFRangio was 99%.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>FFRangio measured from the coronary angiogram alone has a high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy compared with pressure wire-derived FFR. FFRangio has the promise to substantially increase physiological coronary lesion assessment in the catheterization laboratory, thereby potentially leading to improved patient outcomes.<bold>Clinical Trial Registration: </bold>URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique Identifier: NCT03226262. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- *CORONARY angiography
*CLINICAL trial registries
*CORONARY arteries
*CORONARY disease
*STRESS echocardiography
*CONFIDENCE intervals
*CARDIAC catheterization
*COMPARATIVE studies
*CORONARY artery stenosis
*CORONARY circulation
*DIAGNOSTIC imaging
*LONGITUDINAL method
*RESEARCH methodology
*MEDICAL cooperation
*COMPUTERS in medicine
*RESEARCH
*THREE-dimensional imaging
*EVALUATION research
*PREDICTIVE tests
*SEVERITY of illness index
RESEARCH evaluation
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00097322
- Volume :
- 139
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Circulation
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 135697366
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037350